What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
ABC’s 2019 Safety Performance Report, as summarized by Building Design + Construction (BD+C), links proactive safety practices with substantially better reported outcomes for participating construction companies. The headline “680% safer” statement is not a usable promise or a defined incident-reduction rate: BD+C does not explain the metric, baseline, or calculation behind it. The clearest operational finding is the report’s comparison of daily and monthly toolbox talks, alongside broader evidence that structured, proactive safety management can outperform a passive approach.
What the ABC claim actually covers
Peter Fabris’s BD+C article, published May 7, 2019, reports findings from Associated Builders and Contractors’ (ABC) 2019 Safety Performance Report. ABC evaluated safety practices through its STEP Safety Management System, using information from member companies that recorded nearly one billion work hours across construction, heavy construction, civil engineering, and specialty trades.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
That is a large body of activity, but it is not the same as a controlled experiment involving every construction company. The article describes relationships between safety practices and reported outcomes among participating ABC members. It does not establish that a single practice caused every difference, that the participating firms represent the entire industry, or that a contractor adopting the same approach will receive the same result.
Greg Sizemore, ABC’s vice president of health, safety, environment and workforce development, characterized the report this way: “This is one of the few studies of commercial and industrial construction firms doing real work on real projects, and it shows that implementing best practices can produce world-class construction safety programs.” That is ABC’s description of its report, not an independent methodological review.
#1 Best Overall
- WIDE APPLICATION RANGE PC lens has high light transmittance. It can be used in various situations. Suitable for walking, jogging, cycling, road trips or travel, to construction, industry and more.
- Adjustable temples: The length of the temples can be adjusted, so that regardless of the face or head size, it is suitable for men, women, children, teenagers, adults and the elderly. The ergonomic integrated lens design is comfortable and stress-free.
- High-definition anti-fog field of vision: double-layer coating, strong hardness and abrasion resistance, high-tech lens without fogging, high-definition transparency of UV lens, wide-angle vision with humanity design of optical glasses. It also has anti-dust, anti-pollen and anti-allergic functions. It can reduce ultraviolet rays and block glare, protect eyes from harmful light and have anti-splash function to protect eyes from strong impact.
- Ideal for work and entertainment: very suitable for driving, shopping, washing, painting, walking, laboratory, woodworking, construction, DIY work, grinding machine, car factory, ironworks, cycling, shooting or other outdoor activities. In these activities, it can protect your eyes well.
- WIDE APPLICATION RANGE PC lens has high light transmittance. It can be used in various situations. Suitable for walking, jogging, cycling, road trips or travel, to construction, industry and more.
The reported figures, with their limits
| Figure | What BD+C says ABC reported | What the accessible article does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 680% safer | Companies adhering to best practices had a safety record up to 680% safer than the industry average. | The article does not define “safety record,” identify the industry-average baseline, show the calculation, or explain whether the comparison was adjusted for company, project, trade, or workforce differences. |
| Up to 85% reduction in recordable incidents | ABC’s report is described as finding that proactive safety practices could reduce recordable incidents by up to 85%. | The article does not provide the underlying sample breakdown, uncertainty range, time period for every comparison, or a causal analysis showing that the practices alone produced the reduction. |
| 85% lower TRIR and DART rates | For 2018 leading-indicator data, daily toolbox talks were associated with reductions in Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and Days Away, Restricted or Transferred (DART) rates compared with monthly sessions. | The article does not show the calculation, the number of firms in each frequency group, or whether firms holding daily talks differed systematically from firms holding monthly talks. |
| Nearly one billion work hours | The member-company data covered nearly one billion hours across construction, heavy construction, civil engineering, and specialty trades. | BD+C does not provide a complete participant count, project mix, geographic breakdown, or weighting method in the accessible summary. |
“Up to” matters in each incident-related statement. It identifies the strongest reported comparison, not an expected result for an average contractor. A company should treat the figures as evidence supporting investment in prevention, not as a guaranteed percentage improvement or a target to advertise.
Why “680% safer” cannot be read as a 680% reduction
The phrase sounds precise, but the article supplies none of the information needed to interpret it mathematically. It does not say whether ABC compared incident rates, a composite score, several leading and lagging indicators, or another measure. It does not identify the denominator for “industry average,” the period used, or whether “safer” means fewer events, lower severity, better compliance, or a combination.
That uncertainty prevents several common but incorrect translations. The statement should not be rewritten as “incidents fell 680%,” because a percentage reduction of that size would not describe a conventional rate in the ordinary way. Nor should it be turned into a forecast that a new safety program will make a particular site seven times safer. The responsible wording is that ABC reported a safety-record comparison of up to 680%, while the accessible summary leaves the calculation unresolved.
The original report PDF linked by BD+C was not accessible for verification, and no official copy was located in the material available for this article. Consequently, the headline number cannot be independently reconstructed here. It also comes from a 2019 report summary, so it should not be presented as 2026 performance data or as a current industry benchmark.
What STEP and “leading practices” mean in practical terms
STEP is ABC’s Safety Training and Evaluation Process, described in the article as the safety management system used to assess participating companies’ practices. The BD+C summary refers to eight core leading indicators for 2018 but does not list a complete indicator-by-indicator table in the accessible text. It does identify toolbox-talk frequency as the strongest finding among the indicators highlighted.
A leading indicator is an action or condition that can be monitored before an injury occurs; a recordable incident, TRIR, or DART is a lagging outcome measured after an event. The distinction is useful for managers: incident rates tell you what happened, while leading indicators show whether the controls intended to prevent harm are being performed.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchRank #2
- The JKSafety Reflective Safety Vest for Men Women is a premium choice for safety apparel, featuring a vibrant fluorescent color and exceptional breathability. The High Visibility Vest Crafted from 100.00% Polyester Mesh fabric, it is lightweight and comfortable to wear in tropical environments, suitable for both men and women who need a functional reflective safety vest. An ideal Hi Vis work vest for workers.
- Your Visibility Matters: For enhanced safety in low-light conditions, the construction vest includes four 2-inch wide highly reflective safety tapes meeting ANSI/ISEA and OSHA standards, with extended fluorescent trims. The reflective neon vest with two cover the shoulders, while the others cover the chest and waist area, ensuring visibility when in contact with any light source. The JKSafety Hi Vis Vest is a premium neon safety apparel to keep you visible in your workplace.
- Key Features: The PPE boasts eight utility pockets or compartments, including a 2-tier pocket with an ID Credential window, three different sizes of pouches for various small items, and two large expandable utility pockets near the waist area, providing convenient access to daily necessities. The JKSafety safety vest is the ideal gift for your family and friends. chalecos reflectantes de seguridad.
- Applications: The JKSafety Reflective Vest for Men is ideal for municipal workers, road workers, contractors, engineers, surveyors, airport ground crews, warehouse workers, public safety marshals, crossing guards, security personnel, drivers, survey crews, and volunteers. Also suitable for recreational activities such as cycling, hiking, walking, jogging, and motorcycling.
- Reminders: While the HV Vest complies with ANSI/ISEA safety standards and is suitable for general applications, it is not designed for Anti-Static or FR standards. Please refer to the Size Chart for accurate measurements. In case of any manufacturing defects, please take photos and contact us for an exchange or refund. Add to Cart now for a risk-free purchase.
For a contractor, “best practices” should therefore mean a repeatable management system rather than a poster, a one-time orientation, or a collection of rules that supervisors cannot verify. The system should make expectations visible, give workers a way to raise hazards, assign corrective actions, and use outcome data to adjust the work.
Toolbox talks: the clearest actionable finding
ABC’s 2018 comparison found materially better TRIR and DART results among companies holding toolbox talks daily rather than monthly. The finding supports increasing the cadence of short, work-specific conversations, but it does not prove that frequency alone caused the difference. Companies that talk every day may also have stronger supervision, planning, training, reporting, or management commitment.
Set a cadence that matches the work
Schedule a brief discussion before the shift, at the start of a new phase, or whenever conditions change. Daily is the frequency in the reported comparison; if a project begins with a different cadence, document the reason and establish a transition plan rather than treating a calendar interval as the entire program.
Make each discussion task-specific
Use the day’s actual activities, equipment, access routes, weather, interfaces with other trades, and known changes as the agenda. A generic reading repeated from a binder may satisfy attendance but will not demonstrate that workers understand the hazards they face. Ask what is different today, which control prevents the worst credible outcome, and who will verify it.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Require worker participation
Rotate who raises the hazard, invites questions, or demonstrates a control. Provide a practical way for a worker to stop and escalate a task when conditions do not match the plan. Record questions and unresolved concerns so that attendance is not mistaken for engagement.
Close the loop
Every issue raised should have an owner and a due time. Supervisors can begin the next talk by reporting what was corrected, what remains open, and what temporary control is in place. This turns the meeting from a lecture into an operating feedback cycle.
Rank #3
- STRONG, DURABLE DESIGN — Thanks to the tough, polycarbonate wraparound construction, these anti fog safety glasses for men and women offer superior protection from both direct and peripheral threats. They are the ANSI Z87.1 safety glasses women and men trust.
- LIGHT, COMFORTABLE AND ADJUSTABLE — These clear eye protection glasses have extendable arms and an adjustable soft nose pad so you always get the perfect fit. They're also armed with non-slip rubber grips so your mens safety glasses stays on.
- ULTRASHIELD LENS TECHNOLOGY — Compared to most clear protective glasses, the premium coating on our safety glasses anti fog is 5x more fog resistant and 2x more scratch resistant. No fog, no scratch, and zero optical distortion.
- 100% UV PROTECTION — The clear lenses of these protective glasses block 100% UV radiation. They make great lab safety glasses, shooting glasses, and work glasses for men. They’re great as construction glasses, medical safety glasses, antifog safety glasses and more.
- BUILT TO LAST — Your safety glasses for women and men come with a lifetime warranty. If there’s an issue, we’ll replace your saftey glasses or refund you because we stand behind the high quality of every product and we’ve got your back, no matter what.
A step-by-step way to apply the finding
- Assign accountability. Name the person responsible for the site safety system, the supervisor who leads each talk, and the manager who reviews unresolved actions. Make authority to pause work explicit.
- Establish a baseline. Gather the company’s recent TRIR and DART results, hours worked, recordable events, restricted or transferred cases, and days away. Keep project and company figures separate so a large project does not hide a small-site problem.
- Map upcoming work. Review the schedule, subcontractor interfaces, lifts, excavations, temporary works, energy controls, traffic changes, and other high-consequence activities. Build talk topics around the work actually planned.
- Run the talk before exposure. Hold it where the crew can see the work area, use drawings or equipment when helpful, and confirm that the required controls are available before production begins.
- Check understanding. Ask workers to explain the critical control in their own words or show where it applies. Correct misunderstandings immediately; do not rely on a signature alone.
- Log actions. Capture the topic, crew, date, attendance, hazards raised, assigned owner, deadline, and verification. Keep records consistent across projects so managers can identify recurring gaps.
- Verify in the field. Supervisors should compare the agreed controls with actual conditions later in the shift and after changes. A completed form without field verification is weak evidence that the control was working.
- Review trends. At a regular management meeting, examine both activity measures and outcomes. Adjust training, planning, staffing, or supervision when the same concern recurs, even if no injury has yet occurred.
How to measure whether the program is improving safety
Use TRIR and DART as outcome measures because they are the rates named in the ABC comparison, but define the reporting rules before collecting data. Decide who records an event, how hours are counted, how subcontractor incidents are handled, and when a case is assigned to a project or the company. Consistent definitions matter more than a single impressive month.
Pair those lagging measures with a small set of leading checks that your team can verify. Useful examples include the percentage of planned talks completed, the proportion of talks tied to current tasks, hazards reported by workers, corrective actions closed by their due dates, and field checks confirming that controls were installed. These are management measures, not substitutes for injury reporting; their purpose is to show whether prevention work is happening.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsCompare like with like: the same type of project, similar work phases, comparable hours, and the same reporting period. Look for sustained direction rather than reacting to one incident or one quiet month. If results improve, ask which changes coincided with the improvement and whether they are being performed consistently; do not claim that a single meeting or supervisor caused the outcome without evidence.
What the numbers require managers to document
Before comparing projects, write down the population represented by each number. State whether the hours and incidents belong to employees, subcontractors, or both; identify the reporting period; and note the work types included. A rate calculated for a specialty-trade crew should not be casually compared with a mixed portfolio covering civil and heavy construction. Keeping those boundaries visible makes later comparisons more credible.
Retain the underlying counts as well as the rates. Managers should be able to trace a reported TRIR or DART result to hours worked and the cases included in the numerator. When a project closes, preserve its meeting logs, hazard observations, action records, and outcome summary together. That record helps distinguish a real change in performance from a change in reporting practice or project mix.
Planning the people and time required
Daily conversations have an operational cost even when no special software or equipment is purchased. Someone must prepare a relevant topic, assemble the crew, lead the discussion, answer questions, record actions, and verify controls in the field. Supervisors and workers spend paid time away from production, while managers need time to review open items and trends. ABC’s summary supplies no dollar estimate, staffing ratio, or return-on-investment calculation, so a contractor should budget these resources internally rather than attach an unsupported savings figure to the 680% claim.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #4
- APPLICATIONS: reflective tape is used to warn and remind of obstacles, to mark dangerous areas in construction sites. Tape is also used for crime scene decorations, marking important locations... caution duct tape is also used for Halloween decorations, zombie parties, indoor and outdoor decorations, etc.
- DISPLAYABILITY: The tape is 3 inches wide for maximum readability and visibility from a distance, uses danger tape to warn pedestrians that are visible from a distance. In particular, color duct tape rolls have a reflective effect during the day, at night or even when the weather is inclement, raining, blizzard, etc.
- HIGH DURABILITY: Reflective tape is made of high quality Polyethylene which is very durable, waterproof. The warning text on the Tape roll does not fade when encountering bad weather such as rain, blizzard, etc.
- HALLOWEEN DECORATION: tape roll is popularly used for halloween party decorations. We have many colors of tapes for you to choose, decorate the party according to your preferences. Halloween tape can be used to decorate the yard, doors, corridors.
- SIZE: 3-inch wide by 1000 ft long, yellow, red warning tape highlights text, clearly visible in bold black lettering.
A short, consistent format can make the commitment manageable: identify the day’s exposure, confirm the critical control, invite worker concerns, assign action owners, and verify completion. The format should be adapted to the project rather than reduced to a script. A toolbox-talk guide or meeting-topic book can help organize recurring subjects and prompts, but it is an optional implementation aid, not a product named or endorsed by ABC or BD+C.
Common implementation failures and corrections
- Using the headline as a promise. Presenting “680% safer” as a guaranteed return can undermine credibility. Describe it as ABC’s reported comparison and explain what is not defined.
- Increasing frequency without improving relevance. Daily meetings that repeat boilerplate language become background noise. Tie each agenda to the work, conditions, and controls for that shift.
- Counting signatures instead of conversations. Attendance proves that a form was completed, not that a worker understood a hazard. Add questions, demonstrations, and supervisor verification.
- Leaving actions open. A hazard raised without an owner or deadline teaches workers that reporting changes nothing. Track closure and explain temporary controls when permanent work must wait.
- Mixing incompatible data. Combining company, project, and subcontractor rates without a clear rule can create misleading trends. Keep the populations and hours transparent.
- Assuming association proves causation. Firms with daily talks may differ in many other ways. Use the finding to justify a practical trial and measurement plan, not to claim that frequency alone determines safety.
- Treating a 2019 result as a current benchmark. Construction methods, workforces, and reporting practices change. Use the report as historical evidence and establish your own current baseline.
Daily versus monthly talks: a decision guide
| Question | Daily cadence | Monthly cadence |
|---|---|---|
| What the ABC comparison reports | Associated with lower TRIR and DART outcomes in the 2018 leading-indicator analysis. | Used as the comparison frequency in that analysis. |
| Ability to address changing work | Allows hazards and controls to be revisited as tasks and conditions change. | May leave long gaps between the discussion and the exposure being managed. |
| Management requirement | Needs prepared topics, supervisor time, participation, and action tracking to remain useful. | Requires additional interim communication when work changes between scheduled meetings. |
| How to evaluate it | Track completion, relevance, worker questions, corrective-action closure, and outcome trends. | Document why the cadence is sufficient for the project and how changes are communicated between meetings. |
The table’s practical implications are management guidance, not additional findings from ABC. The report supports examining frequency; it does not prescribe one universal meeting length, script, or staffing model.
Questions to ask when reviewing a safety program
Managers can test whether a program is functioning by asking a few direct questions. Are talks occurring before workers encounter the hazard, or only after an event? Can a worker describe the control and identify who checks it? Does every raised concern have an owner and a due date? Do field observations confirm that the promised control is present? Are trends reviewed across comparable projects instead of being averaged into one company number?
These questions also expose weak evidence. A high completion percentage with no worker questions may indicate a sign-in exercise rather than participation. A falling incident rate with fewer hours or a different project mix may not represent improved controls. Conversely, an increase in reported hazards can be a sign that workers trust the reporting process, not necessarily that conditions suddenly worsened. Interpret activity and outcome measures together.
What a contractor can reasonably conclude
The strongest defensible conclusion is that ABC’s member-company data, as reported by BD+C, associate proactive safety management with better reported performance and identify frequent toolbox talks as an especially important leading-indicator difference. That supports investing in regular, relevant, participatory conversations connected to field verification and corrective action.
The evidence does not justify promising a fixed reduction, claiming that daily talks alone produce every improvement, or treating the unexplained 680% phrase as a standardized safety metric. A contractor that adopts the practices should set a baseline, define its measures, document implementation, and reassess results over comparable work periods. That approach captures the practical lesson while keeping the historical claim in its proper evidentiary limits.
Best Value
- NIOSH APPROVED: For at least 95 percent filtration efficiency against certain non-oil based particles
- COMPATIBLE: With a variety of protective eyewear and hearing protection
- ADJUSTABLE NOSECLIP: Reduces potential for eyewear fogging and helps provide a custom and secure seal
- TWO-STRAP DESIGN: With welded dual point attachement that helps provide a secure fit
- APPLICATIONS: Gringing, sanding, sweeping, bagging, and other dusty operations. Metalworking, chemical processing, construction, and metal processing
Frequently Asked Questions
Does “680% safer” mean incidents fell by 680%?
No. BD+C reports ABC’s phrase but does not define the metric, denominator, baseline, or calculation. It should be presented as a reported safety-record comparison, not as a 680% incident reduction or a guarantee for a new project.
What did ABC say about daily toolbox talks?
For its 2018 leading-indicator analysis, ABC reported that companies holding talks daily had TRIR and DART rates 85% lower than companies holding them monthly. The accessible summary does not show the group sizes or adjust for other differences between firms.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What are TRIR and DART?
TRIR is Total Recordable Incident Rate. DART is the Days Away, Restricted or Transferred rate. They are lagging outcomes, meaning they describe recorded cases after an event rather than whether a preventive activity was completed.
Should every contractor hold a toolbox talk every day?
The comparison supports examining a daily cadence, especially when work and conditions change, but it does not establish one universal schedule. Choose a cadence you can conduct meaningfully, document why it fits the work, and provide interim communication whenever exposure changes.
How much does ABC’s approach cost?
The BD+C summary gives no price, staffing formula, or savings estimate. Daily talks require preparation, worker and supervisor time, records, action tracking, and field verification. Contractors should budget those resources and measure their own results rather than infer a financial return from the 680% wording.
Can a toolbox-talk book replace a safety-management system?
No. A guide can organize topics, but effective implementation also requires worker participation, assigned corrective actions, field verification, consistent reporting, and management review. No specific book or provider is endorsed in the BD+C article.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Is the 2019 finding a current industry benchmark?
No. It is a 2019 report summary based on participating ABC members. Construction work, reporting practices, and company populations change, so use the finding as historical context and establish a current baseline for your own projects.
The Bottom Line
ABC’s 2019 report, as summarized by Building Design + Construction, supports a practical lesson: proactive management and frequent, relevant toolbox talks are associated with better reported safety outcomes. The “680% safer” wording has no defined calculation in the accessible summary, so treat it as a historical comparison—not a promise. Set your own baseline, involve workers, close corrective actions, and verify results with consistent TRIR, DART, and leading-indicator records.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
