Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Calibrating and validating a laboratory X-ray powder diffractometer starts with alignment, then uses a certified reference material to measure how indicated peak positions compare with known crystallographic data. For routine Bragg–Brentano powder work, NIST SRM 640g is the current silicon-powder reference in the supplied 2024 certificate: its certified lattice parameter is 0.5431109 nm ± 0.000008 nm (k = 2) at 22.5 °C. That is a certified lattice parameter—not a universal list of certified 2θ peak positions, and not a universal pass/fail tolerance for your instrument.
Keep three tasks distinct: alignment corrects the instrument geometry; calibration relates its indications to a certified reference; validation checks whether the corrected instrument meets limits your laboratory has defined. This guide covers divergent-beam laboratory powder diffractometers, typically in Bragg–Brentano geometry. It is not a procedure for synchrotron, neutron, or wafer high-resolution XRD instruments, and it does not replace the instrument maker’s alignment manual.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What do calibration and validation mean for a laboratory XRD?
Alignment, calibration, and validation answer different questions. Alignment asks whether the instrument geometry is set up correctly. Calibration asks how measured indications relate to a certified reference. Validation asks whether the aligned and corrected instrument meets a written laboratory requirement for its intended use.
That order matters. A reference material cannot compensate for a mechanically misaligned diffractometer. In Bragg–Brentano geometry, the source-to-rotation-axis distance and rotation-axis-to-receiving-slit distance should be equal, and the specimen surface is presumed to lie on the rotation axis. In practice, exact geometry is rarely achieved; specimen-height error is a normal concern, not an exotic failure.
Popular on Amazon
- Ergonomically Designed: Work in tight areas with a compact design that gets into tough spots
- Both tools are designed to fit into difficult to reach spaces
- Complete a wide range of applications with a high-performance motor that delivers up to 300 UWO, and an impact driver delivering up to 1,400 in-lbs of torque
- Both the DEWALT impact driver and drill driver feature integrated LED work lights with a convenient 20-second delay, ensuring enhanced visibility in dimly lit or challenging work areas
- One-Handed Loading - Keep one hand free with a 1/4 in. hex chuck that accepts 1 in. bit tips
NIST defines an instrument profile function (IPF) as the profile shape and 2θ displacement that the instrument imparts to scans. It depends on the radiation, geometry, and slits. If alignment is wrong, a profile model may try to absorb the error as an expected optical aberration, then apply an incorrect correction. NIST cautions that this can produce erroneous results. A refined-looking fit is therefore not proof that the instrument was aligned or calibrated correctly. See NIST’s alignment and calibration paper.
Which reference material should I use?
Choose the standard for the quantity you need to establish. For line position on an ordinary laboratory powder diffractometer, use the silicon powder SRM 640 series and check the certificate matching the material in hand. For profile characterization, relative intensity, quantitative phase work, or wafer HRXRD, a different artifact may be appropriate.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →| Question | Reference material | What it is for |
|---|---|---|
| Where are laboratory powder lines positioned? | NIST SRM 640g, silicon powder (certificate issued 27 February 2024) | Certified lattice parameter for line-position calibration; also intended for line profile breadth as a function of 2θ. |
| How does the instrument profile behave with minimal sample transparency? | NIST SRM 660c, lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6) | Instrument line-shape/IPF characterization. NIST used it to establish profile parameters before analyzing 640g. |
| How does relative intensity vary with 2θ? | NIST SRM 1976 series, sintered alumina plate | Instrument response, including relative intensity versus angle. Use the current plate’s own certificate for intensity values. |
| Is a quantitative phase method suitable? | Examples include SRM 676a, 674b, 656, 1878b, and 1879a | Quantitative analysis or phase-abundance method qualification, not a substitute for the line-position standard. |
| Is the task high-resolution diffraction of a wafer? | NIST SRM 2000, silicon wafer with Si/Ge epilayer | HRXRD wavelength or angle calibration through certified Si (220) spacing, and wafer miscut certification. |
NIST’s Powder Diffraction SRMs project page lists a wider range of artifacts, including mica SRM 675 for line position. Its summary table and narrative are not fully synchronized: for example, the table still lists silicon 640f and alumina 1976c while other text describes earlier generations. The 640g certificate is dated 2024; verify the current certificate and availability in NIST’s SRM record before ordering rather than relying on a cached summary. This article uses SRM 640g because its current certificate and certification report are in the available data.
What is the certified value for SRM 640g?
The certified result is the powder’s lattice parameter at a specified temperature: a = 0.5431109 nm ± 0.000008 nm (k = 2) at 22.5 °C, certified by NIST in 2024. The quantity is traceable to the SI unit of length. NIST says the material is intended for calibration of powder diffraction equipment for line position and profile breadth as a function of 2θ. Read the SRM 640g certificate alongside the NIST SP 260-245 certification report.
Do not substitute a number printed in the report’s publication landing-page abstract: that abstract gives 0.5431144 nm, while the certificate and report PDF give 0.5431109 nm. The available data identifies the landing-page figure as a transcription error; the certificate and report PDF support the certified value quoted above.
Also popular on Amazon
- Valued Carpenter Pencil Set: You will get 2 pcs solid carpenter pencils with 26 piece 2.8 mm refills, 1 replaceable sharpener, 1 plastic storage box.The complete carpenter pencils combination allows you to finish your work faster and more easily
- Deep Hole Marker Pencil: The deep-hole construction pencils adopts 45mm elongated tip design, which is more convenient to mark in the small hole or in other tight areas that other carpenter markers cannot reach
- Carpenter Pencils with Sharpener: The sharpener is screwed into the top of the work pencil, which won't get lost either. Built-in pencil sharpener that keep the lead with pointed and smooth to Improves line of sight in fine work
- Stronger Solid Lead: This work pencil is matched with a 2.8 mm thick lead , which is much thicker and stronger during the drawing process of construction work, it will not break or damage easily
- Marks on Various Surfaces: 3 colors solid construction pencil can marks on various surfaces,such as metal, plastic, wood, paper etc. Ideals for woodworkers, contractors, craftsmen, builders, merchants and masons
The certificate’s appendix also provides computed, non-certified 2θ information values for Cu Kα radiation at λ = 0.15405929 nm. NIST explicitly says such non-certified values can support method development, harmonization, or process control, but do not provide metrological traceability to the SI. The listed positions are:
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches| hkl | 2θ (degrees) | hkl | 2θ (degrees) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 111 | 28.441 | 400 | 69.127 |
| 220 | 47.301 | 331 | 76.373 |
| 311 | 56.120 | 422 | 88.026 |
| 511 | 94.948 | 440 | 106.703 |
| 531 | 114.086 | 620 | 127.537 |
| 533 | 136.883 |
Use that table only when the wavelength and temperature correction match NIST’s assumptions. Otherwise, calculate the expected Bragg positions from the certified lattice parameter using the instrument’s radiation and an appropriate temperature correction. The certificate’s certified quantity is not a table of universally valid 2θ angles.
Do not combine generations of the silicon SRM. A historical teaching example based on NBS 640b gives a calculated 111 line at 28.438°, whereas 640g’s non-certified information value is 28.441°. A difference between those generations is not evidence of an instrument error. Use the certificate that matches the bottle.
Why is the highest point in a peak not necessarily the true position?
The observed maximum-intensity 2θ position does not automatically reveal the true plane spacing. Specimen displacement, transparency, axial divergence, and other optical effects can move or skew a profile. NIST’s 2015 paper states that “the observed 2θ position of maximum diffraction intensity does not necessarily reflect the true spacing of the hkl planes.”
For divergent-beam instruments, the main profile effects to keep in mind are:
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteAlso popular on Amazon
- 【Great Compatibility】This Katerk 1/4 inch hex shank bit holder is specifically designed for 1/4 inch hex shank drill bits. It's compatible with most 1/4 fast hex handles, hex sockets, various electric screwdrivers, and handheld screwdrivers. The bit holder makes it a valuable addition for any handyman.
- 【Secure and Safe】Built with a secure backup nut design, each drill bit holder securely locks onto your bits, ensuring they stay firmly in place. Additionally, our bit holder incorporates a high-quality steel ball rolling design that holds up to several kilograms of weight, ensuring your various drill bits don't fall off.
- 【Easy One-Handed Operation】The bit holder for impact driver allows you to change bits single-handedly, simplifying your workflow. Its multi-color design further allows for quick identification of the drill bit you need.
- 【Compact and Convenient】Thanks to its compact size, this 1/4 inch bit holder is easy to carry around. The bit holder allows for easy attachment to various tools, making this a convenient addition to your construction accessories. The Katerk bit holder is cast from high-quality alloy material, promising a long product lifespan. Despite its rugged strength, the bit holder remains lightweight, making it portable.
- 【Cool Christmas Gift For Men Stocking Stuffers】 This screwdriver bit holder, driver bit holder, impact bit holder, can be given as a gift to your loved one, especially for anyone involved in construction or electrical work. It's a must-have for stocking stuffers for men and women, tools gifts for dad, tech gadgets for men, gifts for dad, gifts for him, gifts for husband, gifts for boyfriend, cool gadgets for men, and cool gifts for dad.
- Finite source and receiving-slit or detector-strip width: symmetric broadening that does not change with 2θ.
- Flat-specimen defocusing: a geometric effect in the equatorial plane.
- Position-sensitive detector window: symmetric broadening that increases as the window widens and decreases as 2θ increases; only rays striking the detector centerline are in true Bragg–Brentano focus.
- Axial divergence: asymmetric broadening toward lower 2θ below roughly 110° and toward higher 2θ above that, with or without Soller slits.
- Specimen transparency: asymmetric broadening toward lower 2θ.
- Specimen displacement (z height): shifts profiles; it is not merely a width change.
Peak position also depends on how it is defined. Possible choices include the highest-count data point, the top of a smoothed peak, a parabolic fit, or a full-profile fit. Record the method and use it consistently. Narrow slits, Soller slits, and a low-transparency specimen tend to produce more symmetric reflections, making position estimates less dependent on the chosen method.
A graphite diffracted-beam monochromator has a bandpass of approximately 200 eV at 8 keV Cu Kα, according to the NIST alignment paper. A position-sensitive detector can raise counting rate by about two orders of magnitude relative to a point detector, at the cost of the defocus broadening described above. An incident-beam monochromator can simplify the emission spectrum, but does not change the basic Bragg–Brentano geometry conditions.
How do I align the diffractometer before calibration?
Follow the instrument manufacturer’s procedure for the specific model, then use NIST’s sequence as a conceptual check. The first three alignment conditions in NIST’s description are performed with the X-rays off; the beam-on procedures establish angular zeros and beam position. Do not use a peak fit to conceal a mechanical or geometric problem.
- Check mechanical integrity. With the system in its safe, appropriate state, check for unintended play in the tube shield, receiving-slit assembly, sample stage, and comparable parts. NIST notes that movement operators have grown accustomed to can be overlooked. Use the manufacturer’s safety and service instructions; do not force or adjust components beyond your authorization.
- Check the geometry with X-rays off. Confirm the source and receiving radii are equal and bring the specimen plane as close to the rotation axis as the hardware permits. Older gear-driven goniometers used home switches and fixed zero angles relative to those positions; later systems may let the operator set zero in software relative to a home position or encoder. Concentricity of θ and 2θ axes is largely not user-adjustable. NIST identifies a 5 μm concentricity error as a concern because it affects data like specimen displacement; axis precession can be still more problematic if the chosen model does not represent it.
- Establish θ and 2θ zero with an appropriate optic. NIST describes a knife edge, an inversion method, or a glass tunnel. A single knife-edge measurement with a point detector and narrow receiving slit identifies a 50% intensity point, but it presumes the specimen height is already correct. NIST calls that presumption problematic.
- If available, use inversion to separate zero from height. Measure the knife-edge zero in both orientations of a stage that can turn 180° in θ. Half the difference between the two zero angles gives the true 2θ zero independent of z height. Then adjust specimen height on the stage used for measurements until it reproduces that zero. The knife edge also centers the beam on the rotation axis. A precision-ground flat can be used to set θ zero.
- Alternatively, use a glass tunnel alignment optic. NIST describes a rectangular tunnel 20–40 μm wide, 10 mm long, and 5 cm along the beam. It passes X-rays when parallel to the beam and is used to locate both θ zero and 2θ zero.
These are alignment concepts, not permission to improvise a fixture or bypass interlocks. Apply the optical and safety instructions for the installed instrument and record what alignment method was used. Modern pre-aligned or self-aligning optics still benefit from a performance check; NIST’s discussion does not validate every manufacturer’s automated alignment routine.
How do I run a practical validation sequence?
Start with the certificate and instrument configuration, then collect a wide-range reference scan and assess the residual pattern against limits defined by your laboratory. The sequence below combines NIST’s alignment paper, its 2013 Accuracy in Powder Diffraction IV slides, and the SRM 640g certificate; it is not a universal manufacturer procedure.
Also popular on Amazon
- Toolwiz 17-inch magnetic sweeper maintaining a load capacity of up to 8.8 pounds provides a perfect solution to the problem of clearing small ferrous metal objects, such as nails, tacks, bolts, and metal shavings from workshops or garage floors.
- Convenient and portable：17” is good for home, small workshop, or small yard as it is space-saving and more reachable for narrow areas. Perfect for collecting nails or small parts in the car, under the table, and in other nooks or crannies.
- Upgraded Handle Design: The handle features a sturdy, non-telescopic design to completely prevent slipping during use. By simply adding or removing the extension poles, the height can be adjusted to 3 different lengths: 18.9" (48 cm), 32.5" (82.5 cm), and 42.5" (108 cm) from ground to top. This customizable height helps prevent back bending and muscle strain, making your cleaning tasks effortless
- Flexible wheels: Upgrade wheel screws to avoid being too tight to spin or too loose. More comfortable 3-inch rubber wheels roll smoothly on carpet, grass, concrete, and hardwood floors. Just push and pull this rolling magnet-sweeper to pick up metal nails easily.
- Lightweight materials: The magnetic nail sweeper's compact and lightweight design makes the sweeping can be done anywhere you want, Push or pull it under the furniture, passing through the workshop floor, driveway, mud, grass, and gravel.
- Identify the material and certificate. Confirm the SRM letter on the bottle and retrieve the current certificate. Record the certified lattice parameter, reference temperature, uncertainty, and certificate revision. For 640g, the unit contains approximately 7.5 g of silicon powder bottled under argon.
- Write down the instrument configuration. Record radiation or wavelength, tube kV and mA, filter or monochromator, divergence and receiving slits, Soller slits, detector mode, scan mode and speed, and specimen stage/spinner state. These settings affect profile shape and may affect comparability between checks.
- Allow the source to stabilize. NIST let its tube equilibrate at operating conditions for at least one hour before certification scans. That is a certification-laboratory practice, not a general user requirement in the certificate; treat it as a documented reference practice and follow the manufacturer’s guidance for your instrument.
- Prepare the powder correctly. Load a dense, flat powder bed for Bragg–Brentano geometry, as the certificate specifies. SRM 640g was prepared from intrinsic float-zone silicon, crushed and jet-milled to a distribution centered on 4 μm, with none below 2.5 μm, then annealed at 1000 °C for one hour under gettered argon to reduce comminution damage. Do not assume an arbitrary silicon powder is equivalent.
- Control and record temperature. The certified value is at 22.5 °C. NIST’s certification runs controlled laboratory temperature to ±0.1 °C, with thermistors calibrated to ±0.002 °C. If your measurement is at another temperature, do not silently compare an uncorrected lattice parameter with the 22.5 °C value. Record the temperature and use a stated thermal-expansion correction when needed; the available data does not provide the coefficient, so do not invent one.
- Collect a broad angular range. For a Bragg–Brentano linearity check, NIST’s 2013 slides suggest a range of about 20° to 160° 2θ. Wider slits may make a field check faster; narrow slits better support a highest-accuracy check but take longer. Keep the configuration representative of the work you intend to validate.
- Choose and record a peak-position method. State whether each position is the maximum bin, a parabolic estimate, or a full-profile fit, and document any smoothing or profile model. Avoid changing methods between the reference and routine samples without assessing the impact.
- Calculate the reference positions. Use the certified lattice parameter with the wavelength applicable to your instrument and the relevant temperature correction. NIST’s printed 640g information-value peak table assumes Cu Kα, λ = 0.15405929 nm, and is non-certified; do not treat it as a universal answer for different optics or radiation.
- Plot the position residuals. Plot experimental minus reference 2θ against 2θ. A roughly constant offset is consistent with a zero error. A trend consistent with specimen displacement points toward a height problem. Residual structure remaining after those terms contributes to the instrument’s 2θ linearity bandwidth. NIST’s slides recommend plotting theoretical versus experimental peak positions; the available data does not supply a single displacement equation, so use a validated implementation rather than an invented formula.
- Decide what to correct and whether the instrument passes. Separate hardware alignment from any empirical correction. Set the pass/fail limits before reviewing the result, based on the intended use and laboratory quality requirements. Record whether the instrument passed, required adjustment, or needs service.
- Check profile modeling separately when needed. If using fundamental-parameters or Rietveld instrument terms, characterize the IPF with LaB6 SRM 660c or its current successor, where sample transparency is small, then check silicon against its certified lattice parameter. Do not allow the model to re-label alignment error as an optical aberration.
- Validate intensity with the correct artifact. If relative intensity versus 2θ matters, use the current sintered alumina SRM 1976 plate and its own certificate. Do not substitute remembered ratios or silicon peak positions for the plate’s intensity values.
- Check repeatability and retain the evidence. Rescan without remounting, then repeat after remounting. Set a written criterion for acceptable scatter. Keep raw patterns, certificate revision, temperature, optics, peak algorithm, residual plot, and pass/fail decision. For measurements relied upon by another party, a single annual service record is weaker evidence than a documented check before, during, and after the measurement series.
NIST’s own 640g certification settings are useful context, not settings to copy blindly. Its NIST-built instrument used a Johansson incident-beam monochromator, sample spinner, position-sensitive detector, a 1.5 kW fine-focus copper tube operated at 1.2 kW, nominal 0.7° variable divergence slit, 1.5° Soller slit in front of the detector, and no incident-beam Soller. Samples spun at 0.25 Hz and each certification scan took about four hours. The team qualified that instrument with SRM 660c and SRM 676a before collecting 640g data. Its FPA analysis used Pawley refinements; IPF parameters were refined on 660c and then frozen for silicon, while silicon-specific terms included scale, background, lattice parameter, specimen displacement, attenuation, and Lorentzian size broadening. Those choices reflect the certification setup and do not transfer automatically to a different radius, detector, or optical arrangement.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What tolerance and recalibration schedule should I use?
The supplied NIST certificate, certification report, and alignment paper do not set a universal maximum permissible 2θ error or a universal recalibration calendar. They do not say that every instrument must be within 0.01°, 0.02°, or 0.03°, nor that every laboratory must recalibrate every six months. Your laboratory must define acceptance criteria appropriate to its method, decision risk, instrument configuration, and applicable regulatory or contractual requirements.
Secondary guidance should not be mislabeled as NIST specification. A Chem17 article dated 3 November 2026 describes practice thresholds of 0.03° at or below 60° 2θ and 0.02° above 60°, a silicon 111 repeatability standard deviation of 0.002°, a peak-to-valley ratio of at least 50%, and half-year calibration/monthly or per-batch checks. The excerpt does not cite a regulation for those figures. An Atomfair article dated 22 March 2026 says less than 0.01° for high-resolution systems, but recommends earlier SRM generations. These are attributed site recommendations, not NIST certificate limits or established universal requirements. See the respective guidance from Chem17 and Atomfair only as examples of secondary claims to evaluate against your own quality system.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
The SRM itself does not require periodic recertification when stored properly: the 640g certificate says its value is valid indefinitely within the stated uncertainty. That does not mean the instrument cannot drift. Set the check frequency based on instrument stability, workload, service events, method risk, and applicable requirements; record the rationale. The certificate’s longevity is about the reference material’s value, not a guarantee of instrument performance.
How should I store SRM 640g, and what can invalidate the check?
Keep unused silicon tightly capped in its original bottle or an equivalent container. The bottle is under argon to protect against humidity. NIST says the certified value remains valid indefinitely within its stated uncertainty if the material is stored and used properly; improper storage or use, damage, contamination, or other modification can nullify that value.
Also popular on Amazon
- APPLY TO MOST DRILLS : 6 pieces screw extractors work with any drill and all the screw size or bolt (3-12mm), These extractor tools are used to reverse the damaged screw counterclockwise until it is released
- The DIY Tools for Men-Men won't know they need screw extractor set until they have one! This screw extractor set is GIFTS WRAP AVAILABLE, can be gifted to your loved ones as it reflects a fresh trend with fun and practical. Amazing and Unique tool gifts for men women. The must have stocking stuffers for men, gifts for dad, husband, father, him, guy teens, adult, Boyfriend, son on Birthdays, Christmas, Fathers Day or anniversary. Perfect Holiday Gifts Guide
- HIGH QUALITY - This damaged screw remover tool kit is made from High-Speed Steel H.S.S 4341# , which have high hardness of 63hrc, it's durable and easily to remove any damaged screws.
- EASY TO USE: Just two simple steps to get the job done - drill a hole with a cutting size using the right size screw extractor and easily remove the screw or bolt using the removal tool Hardness 63-65HRC: Titanium hardened steel material, more durable than most screw extractors on the market, better hardness and durability than others, buy with confidence and complete peace of mind
- Cool Gadgets for Men Dad Christmas Birthday Gifts for Men and Women - Men won't know they need screw extractor sets until they have one! Every screw has the potential to rust and break, which can create a situation where it cannot be removed. Owning it, there will be no anxiety about rusty screws. This screw extractor set is GIFTS WRAP AVAILABLE, can be gifted to your loved ones as it reflects a fresh trend with fun and practical. Amazing and unique tool gifts for men women. A must have stocking stuffer for men on birthdays, Christmas, Father's Day or anniversaries, a gifts for dads, husbands, fathers, him, adults, boyfriends, sons. The best and most practical and surprising Christmas gifts
Common interpretation traps include using a stale certificate, treating a computed information-value peak list as certified, comparing measurements at the wrong temperature, mounting a low-density or uneven powder bed, or accepting a model fit that has absorbed misalignment. Also keep instrument qualification separate from phase quantification: a silicon line-position check does not validate quantitative phase analysis. NIST’s 1987 discussion distinguishes external calibration (a separate SRM run used to build an instrument correction) from internal calibration (mixing a standard with the unknown so displacement and transparency effects are shared); only its abstract is available in the supplied source set, so detailed curve equations are not reproduced here.
For software-based profile analysis, NIST’s 2015 paper mentions GSAS, HighScore Plus, TOPAS, EVA, PDXL 2, and FPAPC, with FPA capability intended for GSAS-II. It expressly does not endorse or rank those products. The important validation point is methodological: use an appropriate profile model and reference, preserve the alignment check, and avoid letting analysis software disguise incorrect geometry.
What does a good validation record contain?
A validation result is more useful when another analyst can reconstruct how it was obtained. Retain at least:
- Instrument identity, geometry, detector, and relevant alignment settings.
- Reference material identity, lot or bottle information, certificate letter/revision, and certificate date.
- Tube settings, wavelength or radiation selection, filter/monochromator, slits, Soller configuration, detector mode, and scan range.
- Sample preparation and mounting approach, including whether the specimen was spun.
- Laboratory and sample temperature, plus any stated temperature correction.
- Peak-position definition or fitting method and the reference-position calculation basis.
- Raw scan files, residual plot, repeatability data, limits applied, and pass/fail decision.
- Any adjustments, service actions, empirical correction, or deviation and its approval.
NIST’s practical field-check slides describe alignment by optical methods followed by verification with an appropriate sample. They emphasize a broad-angle pattern and the difference between theoretical and experimental peak positions. That gives a compact logic for the record: document geometry first, then show the residual behavior across angle, rather than reporting only one apparently accurate peak.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use ordinary silicon powder instead of an NIST silicon SRM?
Not if you need the certified value or metrological traceability. An uncharacterized powder may contain different impurities, strain, particle effects, or preparation history; its apparent peak positions do not inherit SRM 640g’s certificate.
Should the reference be mixed into my sample or scanned separately?
A separate, external SRM run is useful for deriving an instrument correction, while an internal standard mixed with the unknown can share specimen-displacement and transparency effects. The right choice depends on the measurement question and method; document which approach you use.
Can SRM 640g validate a high-resolution wafer diffractometer?
NIST says high-resolution equipment can be evaluated with 640g only with advanced data analysis. For wafer HRXRD angle or wavelength calibration and miscut, SRM 2000 is the specifically described artifact; powder Bragg–Brentano procedures should not be transferred unchanged.
Why might the powder lattice parameter differ from a silicon single crystal?
NIST measured the 640g feedstock single-crystal value as 0.543102055 nm ± 0.000000027 nm (k = 2), below the certified powder value. Its report attributes the discrepancy to the compressed native oxide layer on silicon particles, which produces hydrostatic tensile stress in the crystallites.
