Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Dual construction project-management information systems (PMIS) create avoidable work when an owner’s required application and a contractor’s own system cannot exchange project data automatically. The result is often double data entry for RFIs, submittals, change orders, schedules and progress payments—not merely the inconvenience of using two brands of software.
A 2019 survey of 112 contracting companies and 98 building owners found that only 16% of contractor respondents said the owner’s PMIS was the same as their own, while 14% said they could integrate the two. Those figures describe that survey’s sample, not a current industry-wide rate. They do, however, show why interoperability belongs in project planning, contracts and procurement rather than being left to site administrators after work starts.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What did the 2019 construction PMIS survey actually find?
The evidence behind the “dual systems” problem is the study Connecting Owners and Contractors: How Technology Drives Connected Construction, released by e-Builder and Dodge Data & Analytics. Its online survey ran in spring 2019 and collected responses from 112 contracting companies and 98 building owners. Nearly three-quarters of the contractor respondents identified as general contractors. Sixty-nine percent of owner respondents worked in the public sector, and many focused on education, government or healthcare projects. The sample is therefore useful context, but it is not a census of construction firms and should not be presented as a current prevalence estimate.
The survey reported that 57% of owners and 52% of contractors used a PMIS. Among contractors, just 16% said the owner’s PMIS was the same application as their own, and 14% said the two systems could be integrated. Seven in 10 owners who had a PMIS reportedly required contractors to use it. That combination creates a predictable situation: the contractor adopts the owner’s application for project-facing administration while retaining a specialized internal application for estimating, production, cost control or company-wide reporting.
Popular on Amazon
- Ergonomically Designed: Work in tight areas with a compact design that gets into tough spots
- Both tools are designed to fit into difficult to reach spaces
- Complete a wide range of applications with a high-performance motor that delivers up to 300 UWO, and an impact driver delivering up to 1,400 in-lbs of torque
- Both the DEWALT impact driver and drill driver feature integrated LED work lights with a convenient 20-second delay, ensuring enhanced visibility in dimly lit or challenging work areas
- One-Handed Loading - Keep one hand free with a 1/4 in. hex chuck that accepts 1 in. bit tips
In the same 2019 survey, 42% of contractors said they used both the owner’s project-management application and a specialized contractor application. The study also found that 73% of contractors associated double entry of construction data with a medium or high impact on worker productivity. Construction Dive’s coverage of the findings reported that 62% of contractors said double entry affected their data-entry error rate and 70% said it slowed the flow of information. These are respondents’ reported effects, not an independently measured cost or productivity benchmark. See the Building Design + Construction summary of the survey and Construction Dive’s account of the data-connectedness findings.
Only 45% of respondents were satisfied with the state of data connectedness at the time. At the same time, 65% of owners and 51% of contractors saw high or very high value in a single platform for collaboration and sharing. Those responses indicate demand for connected information, not proof that every project should force every participant onto one universal product.
Recommended Free Tools
“The problem is, they [the two applications] have not worked together well,” Steve Jones of Dodge Data & Analytics said in the study coverage, describing the data silos between owners and contractors.
Why do owners and contractors keep separate systems?
Separate systems usually reflect legitimate organizational needs. An owner’s PMIS may be designed for portfolio oversight, approvals, audit trails, funding controls and standardized reporting across many projects. A contractor’s system may be optimized for field production, subcontractor management, cost-loaded schedules, labor tracking, procurement and internal forecasting. Each organization also needs to retain records after a project ends, even when it no longer has access to the other party’s environment.
The owner may therefore make its PMIS a contract requirement. The contractor can comply while continuing to use its own application because abandoning established workflows would disrupt estimating, accounting, resource planning or safety processes. The problem starts when the two systems treat the same event as unrelated records. An approved submittal entered in one system may still require manual creation in the other; a change-order status can lag in the contractor’s forecast; and an RFI response may be visible to one team but not the people making schedule or cost decisions.
Also popular on Amazon
- Valued Carpenter Pencil Set: You will get 2 pcs solid carpenter pencils with 26 piece 2.8 mm refills, 1 replaceable sharpener, 1 plastic storage box.The complete carpenter pencils combination allows you to finish your work faster and more easily
- Deep Hole Marker Pencil: The deep-hole construction pencils adopts 45mm elongated tip design, which is more convenient to mark in the small hole or in other tight areas that other carpenter markers cannot reach
- Carpenter Pencils with Sharpener: The sharpener is screwed into the top of the work pencil, which won't get lost either. Built-in pencil sharpener that keep the lead with pointed and smooth to Improves line of sight in fine work
- Stronger Solid Lead: This work pencil is matched with a 2.8 mm thick lead , which is much thicker and stronger during the drawing process of construction work, it will not break or damage easily
- Marks on Various Surfaces: 3 colors solid construction pencil can marks on various surfaces,such as metal, plastic, wood, paper etc. Ideals for woodworkers, contractors, craftsmen, builders, merchants and masons
Different data models make the gap wider. One application may identify a subcontract package by a cost code, another by a contract line, and a third by a work-breakdown structure. Status labels such as “submitted,” “under review,” “approved” and “approved as noted” may not map exactly. Attachments, revision numbers, dates, user permissions and audit histories can also be handled differently. A spreadsheet export or email notification moves information, but it does not necessarily preserve the relationships and controls needed for reliable project administration.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteHow does double data entry increase project risk?
Double entry adds a second opportunity for every transcription mistake and a delay between the original event and its copy. The person re-keying an RFI number, cost value or due date may omit an attachment, select the wrong status or enter a different revision. Even when the values are correct, the copied record can lose the link to the approval, discussion or audit trail that explains why a decision was made.
The operational effects show up in ordinary workflows:
- RFIs: A question logged by the contractor may need to be recreated in the owner’s PMIS. When the answer returns, someone must update the contractor’s log and notify the field team.
- Submittals: Product data, shop drawings and review comments can split across systems, making it harder to confirm which revision was approved for installation.
- Change orders: A potential change, owner authorization, subcontractor quote and forecast impact may live in separate records. A lagging update can distort the expected final cost.
- Progress payments: Percent-complete information, stored materials, retention and approval status may have to be reconciled manually before payment is certified.
- Schedules: A change that affects the owner’s milestone view may not update the contractor’s detailed schedule, creating conflicting dates and avoidable escalation.
The survey does not provide a universal dollar amount for these effects. It does provide a warning about where cost accumulates: administrative hours, rework, slower decisions, error correction and disputes over which record is authoritative. Delays are especially expensive when a field decision depends on information that has been entered in one application but has not yet reached the other.
Is one shared construction platform always the answer?
No. A single platform can reduce duplicate entry, but the 2019 survey does not establish that one application is suitable for every owner, contractor, project type or regulatory environment. A common environment may simplify permissions, reporting and auditability, yet it can also force a contractor to replicate specialized workflows elsewhere or create a difficult migration from established company records.
Also popular on Amazon
- 【Great Compatibility】This Katerk 1/4 inch hex shank bit holder is specifically designed for 1/4 inch hex shank drill bits. It's compatible with most 1/4 fast hex handles, hex sockets, various electric screwdrivers, and handheld screwdrivers. The bit holder makes it a valuable addition for any handyman.
- 【Secure and Safe】Built with a secure backup nut design, each drill bit holder securely locks onto your bits, ensuring they stay firmly in place. Additionally, our bit holder incorporates a high-quality steel ball rolling design that holds up to several kilograms of weight, ensuring your various drill bits don't fall off.
- 【Easy One-Handed Operation】The bit holder for impact driver allows you to change bits single-handedly, simplifying your workflow. Its multi-color design further allows for quick identification of the drill bit you need.
- 【Compact and Convenient】Thanks to its compact size, this 1/4 inch bit holder is easy to carry around. The bit holder allows for easy attachment to various tools, making this a convenient addition to your construction accessories. The Katerk bit holder is cast from high-quality alloy material, promising a long product lifespan. Despite its rugged strength, the bit holder remains lightweight, making it portable.
- 【Cool Christmas Gift For Men Stocking Stuffers】 This screwdriver bit holder, driver bit holder, impact bit holder, can be given as a gift to your loved one, especially for anyone involved in construction or electrical work. It's a must-have for stocking stuffers for men and women, tools gifts for dad, tech gadgets for men, gifts for dad, gifts for him, gifts for husband, gifts for boyfriend, cool gadgets for men, and cool gifts for dad.
The practical objective is shared, trustworthy data, not software uniformity for its own sake. A project can achieve that objective through one system, a controlled integration between two systems, or a carefully governed combination in which only selected records are exchanged. The right design depends on the information that must move, how quickly it must move, who owns each record and how the project will preserve its documentation.
Use the survey’s 65% owner and 51% contractor responses about the value of a single collaboration platform as evidence of perceived benefit, not as a mandate. The same study found that only 45% were satisfied with data connectedness in 2019, which supports investing in better exchange but does not identify a particular vendor or architecture.
What interoperability questions should a project team ask?
Ask these questions before selecting a PMIS, writing a specification or accepting an integration proposal. Require answers in a data-flow diagram and a demonstration using the project’s own workflows, rather than relying on the word “integrated” in marketing material.
- Which records must move automatically? Define the minimum set: RFIs, submittals, drawings and revisions, meeting actions, change events, contracts, payment applications, schedules, cost forecasts and closeout documents.
- What is the system of record for each field? Assign ownership for status, amount, due date, approval, revision and responsibility. A shared screen is not enough if two databases can overwrite one another.
- How quickly must synchronization occur? Decide whether a transaction can wait for a scheduled batch or requires near-real-time exchange. Tie the requirement to safety, procurement, payment and schedule consequences.
- Can each party retain its own project records? The owner and contractor should be able to continue company-level reporting while exposing the project information the other party needs. Confirm what remains accessible at termination and during an audit.
- How are identifiers and revisions mapped? Test cost codes, contract numbers, drawing revisions, RFI numbers, subcontract packages and user identities. Document what happens when one system has a value the other cannot represent.
- Are attachments, comments and audit trails preserved? Determine whether the exchange carries files, markup, review history, timestamps and the identity of the approver—not just a status flag.
- What happens when synchronization fails? Require error queues, alerts, retry rules, reconciliation reports and a named person responsible for clearing exceptions. A silent failure is worse than a visible manual task.
- How are permissions and sensitive data handled? Map who can see commercial terms, personal information, safety records and design documents. Confirm that an integration does not broaden access beyond the contract.
- How will the project prove completeness? Agree on periodic reconciliations, version-retention rules and export formats for turnover. The team should be able to show that every approved change and payment record is accounted for.
How should teams compare a shared system with an integration?
Use the same decision axes for both options. The goal is to reduce duplicate entry without sacrificing documentation, transparency or each organization’s operational needs.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11| Decision axis | Questions to answer | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic exchange | Do approved records, status changes and attachments transfer without re-keying? | A proposal relies mainly on CSV exports, email or manual copy-and-paste. |
| Record ownership | Can the owner and contractor keep their own records while sharing agreed project data? | No clear system of record or overwrite rules. |
| Workflow coverage | Are RFIs, submittals, change orders, progress payments and schedules supported end to end? | Integration covers one log but not its approvals, documents or downstream cost effects. |
| Exception handling | How are rejected transactions, missing fields and duplicate records identified and corrected? | Failures disappear into an inbox with no reconciliation report. |
| Closeout and access | What data can each party export and retain when the project or contract ends? | Historical records depend on a subscription or user account that may be removed. |
The 2019 coverage mentioned systems that could integrate at that time, but those references are historical and do not verify current capabilities. Treat any present-day claim as something to confirm in current technical documentation, a contractual service description and a project-specific proof of concept.
Also popular on Amazon
- Toolwiz 17-inch magnetic sweeper maintaining a load capacity of up to 8.8 pounds provides a perfect solution to the problem of clearing small ferrous metal objects, such as nails, tacks, bolts, and metal shavings from workshops or garage floors.
- Convenient and portable：17” is good for home, small workshop, or small yard as it is space-saving and more reachable for narrow areas. Perfect for collecting nails or small parts in the car, under the table, and in other nooks or crannies.
- Upgraded Handle Design: The handle features a sturdy, non-telescopic design to completely prevent slipping during use. By simply adding or removing the extension poles, the height can be adjusted to 3 different lengths: 18.9" (48 cm), 32.5" (82.5 cm), and 42.5" (108 cm) from ground to top. This customizable height helps prevent back bending and muscle strain, making your cleaning tasks effortless
- Flexible wheels: Upgrade wheel screws to avoid being too tight to spin or too loose. More comfortable 3-inch rubber wheels roll smoothly on carpet, grass, concrete, and hardwood floors. Just push and pull this rolling magnet-sweeper to pick up metal nails easily.
- Lightweight materials: The magnetic nail sweeper's compact and lightweight design makes the sweeping can be done anywhere you want, Push or pull it under the furniture, passing through the workshop floor, driveway, mud, grass, and gravel.
What should the contract and governance plan specify?
Put interoperability requirements in the owner’s information requirements, the contractor’s execution plan and the contract exhibits. Define required workflows, data fields, naming conventions, response times, permission roles, retention periods and the procedure for correcting a failed exchange. State which party maintains the integration, who pays for configuration and what happens if a software update changes an interface.
Establish a joint data-governance group at project startup. Include the owner’s administrator, the contractor’s project controls lead, design representatives and the people responsible for cost and payment approvals. Give the group authority to resolve conflicting field definitions and to approve changes to mappings. A short weekly exception review during mobilization can prevent a backlog from becoming a hidden parallel process.
Also agree on a fallback. If an interface is unavailable, the team needs a controlled temporary register, a time limit for manual entry and a reconciliation method when service resumes. The fallback should preserve the original transaction identifier and attachment set so that a temporary workaround does not create permanent duplicate records.
How can a project reduce duplicate entry when the owner mandates its PMIS?
Start by separating mandatory owner reporting from internal contractor management. List the owner’s required records and the contractor’s essential internal records, then identify the smallest overlap that must stay synchronized. Automate that overlap first instead of attempting to mirror every internal field.
- Map each required owner transaction to its contractor equivalent, including identifiers, statuses, dates, amounts and attachments.
- Choose one direction of authority for each field. For example, the owner may control approval status while the contractor controls production quantities.
- Configure validation before transmission so missing cost codes, invalid dates or oversized files fail visibly.
- Give project staff a dashboard of queued, rejected and successfully synchronized records.
- Reconcile a sample of RFIs, submittals, changes and payment applications at a fixed cadence, recording the result.
- Measure administrative effort and error corrections as operational indicators, without claiming that the 2019 survey’s percentages are your project’s results.
This approach preserves the owner’s required visibility while allowing the contractor to keep the specialized tools that support its business. It also makes the remaining manual work explicit so the team can decide whether further automation is worth its cost.
Also popular on Amazon
- APPLY TO MOST DRILLS : 6 pieces screw extractors work with any drill and all the screw size or bolt (3-12mm), These extractor tools are used to reverse the damaged screw counterclockwise until it is released
- The DIY Tools for Men-Men won't know they need screw extractor set until they have one! This screw extractor set is GIFTS WRAP AVAILABLE, can be gifted to your loved ones as it reflects a fresh trend with fun and practical. Amazing and Unique tool gifts for men women. The must have stocking stuffers for men, gifts for dad, husband, father, him, guy teens, adult, Boyfriend, son on Birthdays, Christmas, Fathers Day or anniversary. Perfect Holiday Gifts Guide
- HIGH QUALITY - This damaged screw remover tool kit is made from High-Speed Steel H.S.S 4341# , which have high hardness of 63hrc, it's durable and easily to remove any damaged screws.
- EASY TO USE: Just two simple steps to get the job done - drill a hole with a cutting size using the right size screw extractor and easily remove the screw or bolt using the removal tool Hardness 63-65HRC: Titanium hardened steel material, more durable than most screw extractors on the market, better hardness and durability than others, buy with confidence and complete peace of mind
- Cool Gadgets for Men Dad Christmas Birthday Gifts for Men and Women - Men won't know they need screw extractor sets until they have one! Every screw has the potential to rust and break, which can create a situation where it cannot be removed. Owning it, there will be no anxiety about rusty screws. This screw extractor set is GIFTS WRAP AVAILABLE, can be gifted to your loved ones as it reflects a fresh trend with fun and practical. Amazing and unique tool gifts for men women. A must have stocking stuffer for men on birthdays, Christmas, Father's Day or anniversaries, a gifts for dads, husbands, fathers, him, adults, boyfriends, sons. The best and most practical and surprising Christmas gifts
What are the limits of the available evidence?
The statistics in this article come from a spring 2019 online survey and contemporaneous trade coverage. The respondent mix leaned toward general contractors and public-sector owners in education, government and healthcare. The sources do not provide a current, neutral product comparison, a verified cost per project, or a universal return-on-investment figure. They also do not prove that every project experiences the same productivity, error or schedule effects.
Use the findings as a problem definition: owners and contractors often have valid reasons to maintain different applications, and the value is lost when those applications cannot exchange the data needed for decisions. Current project teams should validate capabilities, prices, security and support directly against their own workflows and contract obligations.
What is the practical takeaway?
Dual PMIS environments become expensive when people, rather than reliable interfaces, connect the records. Before work begins, define the data that must move, assign ownership for every critical field, preserve attachments and audit trails, and require visible handling of synchronization failures. A single platform may be appropriate, but a well-specified integration can deliver the same operational objective while letting owners and contractors retain the systems they need.
The 2019 survey’s message remains useful when stated carefully: disconnected owner and contractor applications turn ordinary administration into duplicate work. Treat interoperability as a project-control requirement, not an optional technology feature.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an owner require a contractor to use its PMIS and still allow the contractor’s own system?
Yes, provided the contract defines which records must be maintained in the owner’s environment and how information from the contractor’s system will be synchronized. The parties should also specify access after termination, correction procedures and responsibility for integration failures.
What is the difference between a data export and a true PMIS integration?
An export typically moves a snapshot that someone must upload, map or reconcile. An integration exchanges defined transactions with identifiers, validation, status handling, attachments and error reporting, so the receiving record remains connected to the source event.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How should a team handle two systems that use different cost codes?
Create and approve a crosswalk before project transactions begin, with one authoritative code for each shared field. Include rules for unmapped or retired codes, and review exceptions rather than allowing staff to invent one-off substitutions.
What should happen to synchronized records at project closeout?
The closeout plan should identify the final system of record, export format, retention period and who receives the archive. Preserve revision history, approvals, attachments and the mapping documentation so the record can be understood without the live integration.
