Black Friday PreviewAmazon USBlack Friday preview: compare before the rush hitsAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsSlow PC?RecommendedPC slow today? Run a repair scan before it gets worseResolve common Windows issues and optimize system performance.Scan NowBlack Friday PreviewAmazon USThe best pick may show up before FridayAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
BETTESWORTHConstruction

Eight Historic Design Blunders—And the Lessons the Evidence Supports

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.

The history roundup behind 8 of history’s biggest design blunders is an engaging architectural-failure timeline, not a verified ranking or engineering manual. Its accessible text names Fidenae, the Lighthouse of Alexandria, the Leaning Tower of Pisa, the St. Francis Dam and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, while referring to additional cases without identifying them. The examples are linked to broad lessons about structural loads, foundations, inspection and environmental change.

The source is a 2013 Fast Company article about NewSchool of Architecture and Design’s “Failure by Design” infographic, with a substantially similar republication by World Architecture Community. Because the accessible material does not explain how “biggest” was judged, the fairest way to read it is as a historical prompt: useful for asking better questions about design risk, but not a substitute for codes, calculations, inspections or project-specific engineering.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

What is the “eight biggest design blunders” list based on?

The list comes from an infographic rather than a documented engineering study. Fast Company published its roundup on August 19, 2013, describing NewSchool of Architecture and Design’s “Failure by Design” graphic. NewSchool’s own page, dated July 5, 2017, presents the infographic as a guide to historical architectural failures and the lessons associated with them. A World Architecture Community page dated August 26, 2013 reproduces the Fast Company wording, so it corroborates the article’s text but does not provide an independent technical investigation.

That distinction matters. The roundup offers a compelling sequence of cautionary stories, but it supplies no selection formula, comparative casualty totals, cost figures, failure-rate analysis or source trail showing why these events are the “biggest.” The headline is therefore editorial framing, not an objective engineering league table. Dates in the article are dates assigned to historical events; the 2013 and 2017 dates above are publication dates for the modern pages.

Popular on Amazon
Sale
DEWALT 20V MAX Cordless Drill and Impact Driver (DCK240C2) | Power Tool Combo Kit, Includes 2 Batteries, Charger and Bag
  • Ergonomically Designed: Work in tight areas with a compact design that gets into tough spots
  • Both tools are designed to fit into difficult to reach spaces
  • Complete a wide range of applications with a high-performance motor that delivers up to 300 UWO, and an impact driver delivering up to 1,400 in-lbs of torque
  • Both the DEWALT impact driver and drill driver feature integrated LED work lights with a convenient 20-second delay, ensuring enhanced visibility in dimly lit or challenging work areas
  • One-Handed Loading - Keep one hand free with a 1/4 in. hex chuck that accepts 1 in. bit tips

The article itself warns that the material is “certainly not to be used for instructional purposes.” That warning should stay attached to every lesson caption. A caption such as “account for the weight the structure will hold” is a memorable takeaway from the infographic, not a replacement for a structural design standard.

Which cases can the accessible article actually identify?

The surviving text explicitly names five examples: the Fidenae Amphitheater collapse, the Lighthouse of Alexandria, the Leaning Tower of Pisa, the St. Francis Dam failure and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse. It also refers to two final cases without naming them. Since the text available for review does not transcribe the entire visual, it cannot establish a complete, reliable eight-item list. Filling the gaps by guessing would turn an evidence-limited roundup into a fabricated catalogue.

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

This is also why the article should not be presented as a ranked list. There is no stated order of severity, and the examples span different eras, materials, purposes and kinds of failure. A crowd-related collapse, a foundation problem and a bridge responding to environmental forces cannot be compared honestly without a defined measure such as deaths, economic loss, service disruption or influence on subsequent practice—and the source provides none of those measures.

What happened at Fidenae in AD 27?

According to the Fast Company roundup, the timeline begins in AD 27 with the collapse of the wooden substructure at the Fidenae Amphitheater during an overcrowded gladiatorial event. The article attributes the failure to the structure carrying more weight than it could safely support and gives the lesson: “Account for the weight the structure will hold.”

That wording should be attributed to the roundup rather than treated as a complete historical or forensic account. The accessible article does not provide a casualty figure, a surviving design drawing, a construction specification or an independent analysis of the collapse. What it does provide is a clear risk question that remains intelligible across centuries: what loads will people, equipment and the structure itself impose, and has the design basis accounted for them?

Also popular on Amazon
Sale
Nicpro Mechanical Carpenter Pencils for Construction (Black, Red) With Case | Deep Hole Marker Pencil Set Includes Sharpener and 26 Refills, Comfortable Grip, Heavy Duty Woodworking Tools for Architect
  • Valued Carpenter Pencil Set: You will get 2 pcs solid carpenter pencils with 26 piece 2.8 mm refills, 1 replaceable sharpener, 1 plastic storage box.The complete carpenter pencils combination allows you to finish your work faster and more easily
  • Deep Hole Marker Pencil: The deep-hole construction pencils adopts 45mm elongated tip design, which is more convenient to mark in the small hole or in other tight areas that other carpenter markers cannot reach
  • Carpenter Pencils with Sharpener: The sharpener is screwed into the top of the work pencil, which won't get lost either. Built-in pencil sharpener that keep the lead with pointed and smooth to Improves line of sight in fine work
  • Stronger Solid Lead: This work pencil is matched with a 2.8 mm thick lead , which is much thicker and stronger during the drawing process of construction work, it will not break or damage easily
  • Marks on Various Surfaces: 3 colors solid construction pencil can marks on various surfaces,such as metal, plastic, wood, paper etc. Ideals for woodworkers, contractors, craftsmen, builders, merchants and masons

For modern readers, the value is not a supposedly universal numerical rule. It is the discipline of identifying the load assumption before construction and checking that the built work matches it. The infographic’s caption is a reminder to verify assumptions, not a calculation method.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Why is the Lighthouse of Alexandria included?

The roundup names the Lighthouse of Alexandria as one of its later historical examples, but the accessible article text does not explain a specific collapse mechanism, date of failure or quantified consequence for the lighthouse. That absence is important: naming a structure in a failure infographic does not, by itself, tell readers whether the issue involved the foundation, materials, maintenance, an extreme event or a later historical interpretation.

A careful account can therefore say only what the source supports: Alexandria’s lighthouse appears in the infographic’s sequence of design failures, while the surviving prose does not supply enough detail to summarize the event technically. Readers seeking a full history of the monument would need a dedicated architectural or archaeological source rather than treating the one-line reference as a complete case study.

What does the Leaning Tower of Pisa illustrate?

Fast Company says the Pisa timeline resumes in 1173 and associates the tower with the lesson that “Making and building on a solid foundation is vital.” The statement is the infographic’s editorial caption. The accessible text does not set out soil data, settlement measurements, construction phases, repair history or a formal diagnosis, so those details should not be inferred from the roundup alone.

Even in this abbreviated form, the example highlights a design dependency: a superstructure cannot be separated from the ground that supports it. A visually impressive design can still be vulnerable if its foundation assumptions are wrong or incomplete. In practical reading, the Pisa caption is a prompt to ask what evidence supports the site and foundation concept, how uncertainty is recorded and how movement would be observed over time. Those are questions to take to qualified professionals, not instructions supplied by the infographic.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Also popular on Amazon
Push to Unlock, Katerk 6pcs 1/4 inch Hex Shank Screwdriver Bit Holder | Aluminum Alloy Drill Bit Holder Keychain Quick-Change Extension Bar Drill Screw Adapter, Black Carabiner, Tool Gifts for Men
  • 【Great Compatibility】This Katerk 1/4 inch hex shank bit holder is specifically designed for 1/4 inch hex shank drill bits. It's compatible with most 1/4 fast hex handles, hex sockets, various electric screwdrivers, and handheld screwdrivers. The bit holder makes it a valuable addition for any handyman.
  • 【Secure and Safe】Built with a secure backup nut design, each drill bit holder securely locks onto your bits, ensuring they stay firmly in place. Additionally, our bit holder incorporates a high-quality steel ball rolling design that holds up to several kilograms of weight, ensuring your various drill bits don't fall off.
  • 【Easy One-Handed Operation】The bit holder for impact driver allows you to change bits single-handedly, simplifying your workflow. Its multi-color design further allows for quick identification of the drill bit you need.
  • 【Compact and Convenient】Thanks to its compact size, this 1/4 inch bit holder is easy to carry around. The bit holder allows for easy attachment to various tools, making this a convenient addition to your construction accessories. The Katerk bit holder is cast from high-quality alloy material, promising a long product lifespan. Despite its rugged strength, the bit holder remains lightweight, making it portable.
  • 【Cool Christmas Gift For Men Stocking Stuffers】 This screwdriver bit holder, driver bit holder, impact bit holder, can be given as a gift to your loved one, especially for anyone involved in construction or electrical work. It's a must-have for stocking stuffers for men and women, tools gifts for dad, tech gadgets for men, gifts for dad, gifts for him, gifts for husband, gifts for boyfriend, cool gadgets for men, and cool gifts for dad.

What do the St. Francis Dam and Tacoma Narrows Bridge failures add?

The roundup dates the St. Francis Dam collapse to 1928 and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse to 1940. It presents these cases as evidence that failures helped prompt routine public-infrastructure inspections and greater attention to changing environmental conditions.

That is a broad editorial claim, not a documented regulatory timeline. The article does not identify which inspection rules changed, which agencies adopted them or how much influence either event had relative to other incidents. It also supplies no comparative death toll, repair cost or probability of failure. The defensible point is narrower: the roundup connects the two events with the ideas of inspection and environmental awareness.

Read that connection as a management question. A design is based on assumptions about loads, surroundings and operation; those assumptions can change, and an inspection regime is one way an owner can look for evidence that the built asset is no longer behaving as expected. The source does not prescribe an inspection interval or a bridge, dam or building standard, so any real project still requires the applicable authority’s rules and competent engineering judgment.

What lessons can architects and owners responsibly take from the roundup?

The infographic’s lessons can be useful when treated as prompts rather than standards. Four themes are visible in the named examples:

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
  • Make the load case explicit. The Fidenae caption directs attention to the weight a structure must hold. That includes checking whether the intended use, occupancy or event differs from the assumption made on paper.
  • Treat the foundation as part of the design. The Pisa caption emphasizes that a sound-looking upper structure cannot compensate for an inadequate or poorly understood base.
  • Plan for observation after completion. The St. Francis Dam and Tacoma Narrows references are paired with the roundup’s claim about routine public-infrastructure inspections. A completed project still needs an owner, records and a process for responding to signs of change.
  • Account for the environment over time. The same pairing highlights changing environmental conditions. Wind, water, temperature, ground movement and altered surroundings are not interchangeable hazards, so the relevant design team must identify which conditions apply to the actual site and use.

These are questions for project planning: What was assumed? What evidence supports the assumption? Who will inspect the asset, what will they record and what action follows a warning sign? They are not calculations, code provisions or permission to copy a historic solution into a modern project.

Also popular on Amazon
Sale
Toolwiz Magnetic Pick Up Sweeper 17-inch Wide, 8.8 Lbs Magnet Pull Force | 8.8 Lbs, Rolling Magnetic Sweeper, Heavy Duty Magnet Pickup with Smooth Wheels, Yard Tools, Clean Nails for Construction
  • Toolwiz 17-inch magnetic sweeper maintaining a load capacity of up to 8.8 pounds provides a perfect solution to the problem of clearing small ferrous metal objects, such as nails, tacks, bolts, and metal shavings from workshops or garage floors.
  • Convenient and portable:17” is good for home, small workshop, or small yard as it is space-saving and more reachable for narrow areas. Perfect for collecting nails or small parts in the car, under the table, and in other nooks or crannies.
  • Upgraded Handle Design: The handle features a sturdy, non-telescopic design to completely prevent slipping during use. By simply adding or removing the extension poles, the height can be adjusted to 3 different lengths: 18.9" (48 cm), 32.5" (82.5 cm), and 42.5" (108 cm) from ground to top. This customizable height helps prevent back bending and muscle strain, making your cleaning tasks effortless
  • Flexible wheels: Upgrade wheel screws to avoid being too tight to spin or too loose. More comfortable 3-inch rubber wheels roll smoothly on carpet, grass, concrete, and hardwood floors. Just push and pull this rolling magnet-sweeper to pick up metal nails easily.
  • Lightweight materials: The magnetic nail sweeper's compact and lightweight design makes the sweeping can be done anywhere you want, Push or pull it under the furniture, passing through the workshop floor, driveway, mud, grass, and gravel.

Is “biggest” an objective engineering ranking?

No. Neither the Fast Company text nor the NewSchool description explains a ranking method. The headline’s number—eight—describes the infographic’s scope, but the material reviewed does not establish that the selected events were the eight deadliest, costliest, most influential or technically important failures in history.

The cases also are not measured on a common scale. They involve different types of structures and different historical records. Without a defined metric and comparable source data, placing one above another would create false precision. The useful comparison is thematic: loads, foundations, inspection and environmental forces recur as questions, while the severity ranking remains unverified.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

How should readers cite the historical claims?

Use the Fast Company roundup for statements about what its infographic says, and link the NewSchool “Failure by Design” page when describing the institution’s infographic. The World Architecture Community version can show that the wording was republished, but it should not be described as an independent technical source.

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Keep dates qualified. AD 27 for Fidenae, 1173 for the start of the Pisa timeline, 1928 for St. Francis Dam and 1940 for Tacoma Narrows are dates given by the roundup. They are not a complete chronology of each structure, and the pages’ 2013 and 2017 dates refer to publication, not to the original creation of the infographic or to the historical failures.

The article also reproduces a saying attributed to architect Frank Lloyd Wright: “A doctor can bury his mistakes, but an architect can only advise his clients to plant vines.” Because the roundup does not identify a primary source for that quotation, present it as an attribution reported by the article, not as independently verified wording by Wright.

Also popular on Amazon
Damaged Screw Extractor Set,Christmas Stocking Stuffers for Adults Men Him | Gifts for Men,Mens Gifts for Dad,Husband,Stripped Screws Bolt Drill Bit Tools for Easy Removal of Rusty Broken Screw
  • APPLY TO MOST DRILLS : 6 pieces screw extractors work with any drill and all the screw size or bolt (3-12mm), These extractor tools are used to reverse the damaged screw counterclockwise until it is released
  • The DIY Tools for Men-Men won't know they need screw extractor set until they have one! This screw extractor set is GIFTS WRAP AVAILABLE, can be gifted to your loved ones as it reflects a fresh trend with fun and practical. Amazing and Unique tool gifts for men women. The must have stocking stuffers for men, gifts for dad, husband, father, him, guy teens, adult, Boyfriend, son on Birthdays, Christmas, Fathers Day or anniversary. Perfect Holiday Gifts Guide
  • HIGH QUALITY - This damaged screw remover tool kit is made from High-Speed Steel H.S.S 4341# , which have high hardness of 63hrc, it's durable and easily to remove any damaged screws.
  • EASY TO USE: Just two simple steps to get the job done - drill a hole with a cutting size using the right size screw extractor and easily remove the screw or bolt using the removal tool Hardness 63-65HRC: Titanium hardened steel material, more durable than most screw extractors on the market, better hardness and durability than others, buy with confidence and complete peace of mind
  • Cool Gadgets for Men Dad Christmas Birthday Gifts for Men and Women - Men won't know they need screw extractor sets until they have one! Every screw has the potential to rust and break, which can create a situation where it cannot be removed. Owning it, there will be no anxiety about rusty screws. This screw extractor set is GIFTS WRAP AVAILABLE, can be gifted to your loved ones as it reflects a fresh trend with fun and practical. Amazing and unique tool gifts for men women. A must have stocking stuffer for men on birthdays, Christmas, Father's Day or anniversaries, a gifts for dads, husbands, fathers, him, adults, boyfriends, sons. The best and most practical and surprising Christmas gifts

What information is still missing from the eight-item story?

The most obvious gap is the full list. Five cases are named in the accessible prose, two final cases are mentioned without names, and the visual itself is not transcribed on the accessible NewSchool page. The supplied Building Design + Construction page could not be independently matched to the source text, so it should not be used to assert that the Fast Company page and the BD+C page are the same publication.

Important technical information is missing as well: failure mechanisms for several entries, casualty and economic data, design drawings, construction records, inspection histories and the specific code or policy changes—if any—that followed. Those omissions do not make the roundup useless; they define its proper role. It is an accessible gateway to further study, not a complete casebook.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

How was this article’s list handled?

The selection here follows the evidence that can be checked in the accessible roundup: it names the five identifiable examples, preserves the dates and captions the article supplies, and clearly labels the unnamed or unsupported portions instead of reconstructing them by inference. The organizing criteria are transparency, fidelity to the source and usefulness to a construction audience—not a new ranking or an implied technical review.

For a project team, the practical takeaway is modest but durable: historical failure stories are most valuable when they expose an assumption that should be written down, checked and revisited. The roundup supports that habit. It does not support a claim that these are definitively history’s eight worst designs, nor does it replace professional design, inspection or regulatory guidance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Building Design + Construction publish the same roundup as Fast Company?

The supplied evidence closely matches a Fast Company article from August 19, 2013, but the Building Design + Construction page itself was not independently verified. It is safer to describe Fast Company as the confirmed close match rather than claim the two pages are identical.

How many of the eight failures are named in the available text?

Five examples are named directly, and the prose refers to two later cases without naming them. Because the infographic is not fully transcribed, the accessible material does not support a reliable reconstruction of all eight entries.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Can the Fidenae, Pisa or Tacoma Narrows captions be used as design requirements?

No. They are editorial lessons attached to a historical infographic, and the roundup explicitly says it is not for instructional purposes. Real projects require applicable codes, documented calculations, qualified designers and the owner’s inspection obligations.

What statistics does the roundup provide for comparing the failures?

It provides the roundup count and several historical dates, but no comparable casualty totals, costs, failure probabilities or economic-impact study. Any claim that one example was objectively larger or more consequential would need separate, primary documentation.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply. Prices as of November 14, 2026 12:04 pm GMT+0000.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?Free scan - under a minute
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?Free driver scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.