CADMATIC 3D Plant Design vs TurboCAD
| CADMATIC 3D Plant Design | TurboCAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $8.33/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | self-hosted, Windows | macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Modeling method | parametric | parametric |
| Cloud collaboration | Yes | — |
| Supported platforms | Windows 10 and Windows 11; available cloud or on premises | Windows and Mac |
| File import and export | DWG, DXF, STEP, IGES, IFC, DGN, RVT, NWD/NWC, RVM, DWF, DWFx, EBМ, EBMX, 3DD | Imports/open files: 54, 25, 22, or 15 formats by Windows edition; exports/saves/publishes: 34, 27, 23, or 16 formats by edition. Listed types include DWG/DXF, STL, SketchUp, PDF, and 3D PDF. |
| Assembly design | — | Yes |
| Sheet-metal tools | — | Yes |
| Surface modeling | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best 3D CAD Software. On Bettesworth Construction, TurboCAD scores higher on our published basis.