Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →There is no universal winner between building new and renovating an airport facility. The right choice depends on the operational need, the asset’s condition, the work required to restore or change its function, applicable design standards, project costs, and funding rules. Start by defining what “renovation” means for the specific asset: FAA guidance distinguishes maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, and replacement, and those categories are not interchangeable.
The comparison should begin with what the airport needs the facility to do, not with a preferred construction method. Rehabilitation can be a sound alternative when it restores the required original functionality, achieves the useful-life outcome relevant to the project, and meets applicable standards to the extent practicable. New construction may be worth evaluating when the existing facility cannot meet the documented need or a new facility offers a material project-specific advantage. Those are conditional tests, not a universal rule that new is safer, faster, more modern, or more cost-effective.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What counts as airport renovation?
“Renovation” is a broad everyday term, not a single FAA project classification. Before comparing alternatives, establish whether the proposed work is routine maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement. FAA classifications distinguish projects by the level of effort and the useful-life outcome; the classification also depends on the asset and the specific circumstances. A funding classification is not, by itself, an engineering recommendation.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteThat distinction matters because the label can shape what a project is expected to deliver and which standards or funding rules are relevant. A maintenance task may preserve an asset without addressing a larger deficiency. Rehabilitation is more comprehensive restoration. Reconstruction restores original functionality to a virtually new facility, while replacement means the facility or item is replaced rather than restored. The project team should describe the actual work and result before choosing a label.
#1 Best Overall
- Valued Carpenter Pencil Set: You will get 2 pcs solid carpenter pencils with 26 piece 2.8 mm refills, 1 replaceable sharpener, 1 plastic storage box.The complete carpenter pencils combination allows you to finish your work faster and more easily
- Deep Hole Marker Pencil: The deep-hole construction pencils adopts 45mm elongated tip design, which is more convenient to mark in the small hole or in other tight areas that other carpenter markers cannot reach
- Carpenter Pencils with Sharpener: The sharpener is screwed into the top of the work pencil, which won't get lost either. Built-in pencil sharpener that keep the lead with pointed and smooth to Improves line of sight in fine work
- Stronger Solid Lead: This work pencil is matched with a 2.8 mm thick lead , which is much thicker and stronger during the drawing process of construction work, it will not break or damage easily
- Marks on Various Surfaces: 3 colors solid construction pencil can marks on various surfaces,such as metal, plastic, wood, paper etc. Ideals for woodworkers, contractors, craftsmen, builders, merchants and masons
| Scope | What it generally means | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance or minor repair | Regular or recurring preservation, care, cleaning, or incidental and minor work. | A minor repair may keep a facility operational as a stopgap until a larger project can be completed. |
| Rehabilitation | More comprehensive restoration of the facility’s original functionality than a minor repair. | For FAA Airport Design AC 150/5300-13B, rehabilitation restores original functionality and results in a useful life at least equal to half the minimum useful life of new construction. This definition applies “for the purpose of this AC.” |
| Reconstruction | Complete restoration of original functionality, resulting in a virtually new facility. | For FAA Airport Design AC 150/5300-13B, reconstruction results in a minimum useful life equal to new construction. FAA design guidance treats reconstruction under the new-construction standards approach. |
| Replacement | Replacing a facility or item rather than restoring it. | Whether it is justified and eligible for funding depends on the particular project and applicable program rules. |
The FAA’s AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design, was issued March 31, 2022, consolidated with Change 1 dated August 16, 2024, and has errata updates dated April 3, 2025. The circular defines rehabilitation and reconstruction for its own purposes; those definitions should not be generalized into a universal lifespan promise for every airport asset or project.
In the circular’s own wording, “For the purpose of this AC, reconstruction represents a complete restoration of the original functionality of the facility, resulting in development with a minimum useful life equal to new construction.” It also says, “For the purpose of this AC, rehabilitation is a restoration of an original functionality of the facility, resulting in a useful life at least equal to half the minimum useful life of new construction.” These are technical classification definitions, not estimates of an individual project’s service life or a guarantee that a particular scope will receive funding.
How should owners compare new construction and rehabilitation?
Compare feasible alternatives against the same documented need. A proposal to preserve an existing asset and a proposal to build new should address the same operational deficiency or forecast demand, use credible condition information, and account for both the project itself and its effects on airport operations.
For each alternative, state what it is expected to fix, what function it will provide, what requirements it must meet, and what impacts it creates. This prevents an uneven comparison—for example, comparing the cost of a narrowly scoped repair with a new facility designed to serve a broader need. If two options address different needs, the comparison should make that distinction explicit rather than treating them as direct substitutes.
1. Define the need and required function
Identify the deficiency, safety concern, demand, or operational requirement the project is intended to address. Check whether it is a near-term need supported by accepted planning, such as the airport’s master planning process. State the function the completed facility must provide, rather than starting with a preferred construction method.
A useful project statement explains the gap between current performance and the required function. Is the concern about condition, capacity, aircraft accommodation, movement, delay, or another operational requirement? The analysis should link the proposed work to that gap. If the need is not clearly documented, it will be difficult to tell whether rehabilitation could address it or whether a new facility is actually necessary.
2. Establish the asset’s condition and the actual scope
Use relevant inspections, pavement-condition information, and facility studies to determine whether routine maintenance can address the problem, whether broader rehabilitation is needed, or whether reconstruction or replacement must be evaluated. A condition finding alone does not decide the project: the study should connect the asset’s condition to the function it must deliver.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Separate a short-term operational fix from the scope needed to resolve the underlying deficiency. Minor repairs can sometimes keep a facility operating until a larger project is completed, but a stopgap should not be mistaken for evidence that the long-term need has disappeared. Conversely, a condition issue does not by itself establish that an asset needs to be replaced. The alternatives analysis should explain how each scope responds to the documented condition and required function.
Rank #2
- Ergonomically Designed: Work in tight areas with a compact design that gets into tough spots
- Compact and Lightweight: Both tools are designed to fit into difficult to reach spaces. The 1/4" impact driver has a length of 5.55 in. and weighs just 2.8 lbs, while the 1/2" drill/driver measures only 7.5 in. and weighs 3.6 lbs
- Both the DEWALT impact driver and electric drill driver feature integrated LED work lights with a convenient 20-second delay, ensuring enhanced visibility in dimly lit or challenging work areas
- One-Handed Loading - Keep one hand free with a 1/4 in. hex chuck that accepts 1 in. bit tips
- Power drill cordless with 1/2" single sleeve ratcheting chuck provides tight bit gripping strength, making bit changes faster and more secure
3. Test capacity and operating effects
Compare what each option would do for aircraft accommodation, movements, delays, and schedule predictability. Include continuity of operations during construction and any effects on alternate airports. An option that appears suitable on the finished facility may have different consequences while work is under way.
Consider both the end state and the construction period. A project may improve capacity after completion but affect how the airport operates while the work is in progress. Where another airport could be used, include the cost and time consequences of that alternative rather than treating it as a free or automatic solution. A sound comparison identifies these effects for each option using project-specific analysis; the available guidance does not establish a standard construction-duration or delay advantage for either approach.
4. Evaluate standards and safety
Under FAA design guidance, new construction and reconstruction are expected to meet current FAA standards. Rehabilitation should meet applicable standards to the extent practicable; if it cannot, guidance calls for a plan to meet the standards in the future. For runway work, safe approaches are a key part of the assessment. The engineering analysis should identify applicable requirements and document how each alternative addresses them.
Do not treat the standards comparison as a simple pass/fail label based only on the project name. The team needs to identify the standards applicable to the asset and scope, explain what can be achieved under each alternative, and record any gap and future plan where rehabilitation cannot meet a standard now. For runway work in particular, safe approaches belong in the analysis alongside pavement or facility condition. Applicable requirements should be confirmed through the relevant FAA design and project guidance.
5. Compare costs, benefits, and disruption
Build a project-specific comparison of lifecycle and project costs, expected benefits, construction impacts, and the cost and time consequences of alternatives such as using another airport. Do not assume that preserving an existing facility is automatically the least expensive option, or that new construction necessarily costs more or takes longer. The FAA’s FAA Airport Benefit Cost Guidance, 2026, discusses rehabilitation alternatives and benefit-cost factors. No broadly applicable published comparison establishes a standard cost, schedule, or lifespan advantage for new construction over renovation.
Use a consistent basis for the alternatives: define the project scope, expected function, relevant costs, benefits, operational impacts, and construction effects for each. Include costs or time impacts associated with alternate-airport use when that is part of the plan. A narrow construction-price comparison may omit lifecycle considerations or disruption, while a broad cost claim without project estimates can be misleading. The right evidence is a project-specific estimate and benefit-cost analysis, not a generic percentage premium or presumed schedule saving.
The FAA material does not provide a universal rule such as “renovation costs a fixed amount less” or “new construction adds a fixed number of months.” Do not use a general cost, schedule, or lifespan figure as though it applies to every airport. Those comparisons depend on the asset, scope, operating conditions, and project circumstances.
6. Assess flexibility, expansion, and useful life
Ask whether the existing facility can support foreseeable operational needs and whether a new facility would materially improve flexibility, ability to expand, or useful life. For terminal decisions, these considerations have particular relevance to FAA’s funding guidance; they do not automatically determine the answer for runways, taxiways, or other assets.
Rank #3
- 【Great Compatibility】This Katerk 1/4 inch hex shank bit holder is specifically designed for 1/4 inch hex shank drill bits. It's compatible with most 1/4 fast hex handles, hex sockets, various electric screwdrivers, and handheld screwdrivers. The bit holder makes it a valuable addition for any handyman.
- 【Secure and Safe】Built with a secure backup nut design, each drill bit holder securely locks onto your bits, ensuring they stay firmly in place. Additionally, our bit holder incorporates a high-quality steel ball rolling design that holds up to several kilograms of weight, ensuring your various drill bits don't fall off.
- 【Easy One-Handed Operation】The bit holder for impact driver allows you to change bits single-handedly, simplifying your workflow. Its multi-color design further allows for quick identification of the drill bit you need.
- 【Compact and Convenient】Thanks to its compact size, this 1/4 inch bit holder is easy to carry around. The bit holder allows for easy attachment to various tools, making this a convenient addition to your construction accessories. The Katerk bit holder is cast from high-quality alloy material, promising a long product lifespan. Despite its rugged strength, the bit holder remains lightweight, making it portable.
- 【Cool Christmas Gift For Men Stocking Stuffers】 This screwdriver bit holder, driver bit holder, impact bit holder, can be given as a gift to your loved one, especially for anyone involved in construction or electrical work. It's a must-have for stocking stuffers for men and women, tools gifts for dad, tech gadgets for men, gifts for dad, gifts for him, gifts for husband, gifts for boyfriend, cool gadgets for men, and cool gifts for dad.
Make the claimed advantage concrete in the alternatives analysis. If flexibility or expandability is a reason to build new, explain how the new option provides it and whether the existing facility could meet the same need through modification or rehabilitation. If useful life is part of the case, identify the relevant project classification and applicable definition instead of relying on the everyday meaning of “renovation.”
7. Include environmental and community effects
Identify the environmental conditions and review requirements that apply to the actual project. Where relevant, assess noise effects and other community impacts for each alternative. These questions are site- and project-specific, so they belong in the alternatives analysis rather than in a generic claim for or against construction.
The available FAA guidance does not establish a universal environmental advantage for either approach. The project team should determine the review appropriate to its location and scope, and compare relevant effects on the same basis as other project impacts. Noise should be considered where relevant, rather than assumed to be either a benefit or a drawback of a particular construction method.
Recommended Free Tools
8. Confirm funding eligibility separately from technical merit
For a project seeking FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funding, confirm project-specific eligibility, justification, airport category, and applicable program rules. The AIP Handbook: Chapter 3 covers eligibility, classification, justification, and mandatory standards. Eligibility means an option may satisfy relevant funding requirements; it does not prove that it is the best technical or operational choice.
Keep funding and project selection as related but distinct tests. First, determine whether the proposed project fits the relevant funding requirements. Separately, determine whether it is the alternative that best addresses the documented need. An option can be eligible without being the strongest technical choice, and the fact that a project is technically attractive does not itself establish funding eligibility. Confirm the rules that apply to the airport type, asset, classification, and specific funding program rather than extending an AIP rule to every airport project.
Should we build a new airport terminal or renovate the existing one?
For terminal development, FAA guidance says modification or rehabilitation of existing facilities must be considered before new terminal development. FAA may consider new terminal development when its cost is comparable and it offers better flexibility, ability to expand, or longer useful life. This is a terminal-funding rule, not a general formula for every airport asset.
Make the terminal comparison explicit: describe what modification or rehabilitation could achieve, what need would remain unmet, and whether a new terminal provides a material advantage in flexibility, expandability, or useful life at comparable cost. Consult the terminal requirements in the AIP Handbook: Appendix alongside project-specific planning and engineering documentation.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
In practice, the terminal analysis should not jump from “the existing building has limitations” to “a new terminal is required.” It should first assess what modification or rehabilitation can accomplish, then identify any remaining operational need. If the case for a new terminal rests on flexibility, expansion, or useful life, the comparison should show how those benefits differ from the existing-facility alternative and whether the cost is comparable under the relevant FAA guidance.
Rank #4
- Long Nib and Deep Hole Marker: Our mechanical carpenter pencil with 45mm nib is designed for easy marking of deep holes or narrow areas. These construction pencils are the great choice for woodworking tools, construction tools, carpenter tools, contractor tools, wood carpentry tools and architect tools
- Extra Refills in 2 Colors for Versatile Marking: The construction mechanical pencil comes with 12 extra 2.8mm refills, including 6 red and 6 black refills. The black refill is suitable for light surfaces, while the red wax is perfect for dark surfaces. Our carpenter mechanical pencil makes sure that you'll have an ample supply for extended use
- Built-in Sharpener: Our construction pencil comes with a built-in sharpener to ensure the mechanical pencil tip is always sharp and ready for use. Never buy an extra pencil sharpener again. A great tool for any woodworker pencil, contractor pencils. The refill can easily be extended or retracted with a simple click of the pencils mechanical, allowing you to work more efficiently and accurately
- Portable Clip Design: Our deep hole construction pencil features a portable clip design, easy to carry and attach to your pocket or tool box, so that you can keep the carpenter pencils mechanical close at hand, making it a convenient tool to have on the go. Great gifts choice for carpenters
- Stronger Pencil Lead: The black refills are made of lead, sturdy and smooth. The red refills are made of wax, clear and light. These marking pencils are much thicker and stronger than normal pencils during the marking process of construction work, suitable for various surfaces, such as glasses, metal, boards, floors, walls, furniture, etc. The written marks can be easily wiped with a wet paper towel when needed
This sequencing is specific to terminal development under the cited FAA funding guidance. Do not apply it as a blanket preference for rehabilitation on runways, taxiways, or every other airport facility. For those assets, use the applicable project and asset guidance, standards, and engineering evidence.
When is airport runway rehabilitation enough?
Runway rehabilitation may be a suitable alternative when the documented scope can restore the required original functionality, meet applicable standards to the extent practicable, and provide the useful-life outcome relevant to the project’s classification. Whether it is enough depends on runway-condition evidence, the operational need, design and safety constraints, and the project’s broader alternatives analysis.
Consider reconstruction or new construction when the existing facility cannot meet the documented operational need, or when a new facility offers a material advantage in capacity, flexibility, expansion potential, or useful life. For runway work, include safe-approach considerations and examine operational continuity during construction. A runway-specific engineering assessment is necessary; the available FAA guidance does not establish a universal condition threshold at which rehabilitation should give way to new construction.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesThat means runway rehabilitation is not justified simply because it costs less in an initial estimate, nor ruled out simply because the runway is old or has a deficiency. The decision should connect condition findings to required function, standards and safety, useful-life expectations, and operational effects. If rehabilitation cannot meet applicable standards in full, the analysis should address practicability and the future plan described in FAA guidance. If the facility cannot meet the airport’s documented need, the team should evaluate whether reconstruction or a new facility is necessary to close that gap.
How do airport owners decide between reconstruction and rehabilitation?
First determine whether the work restores the original function or replaces it with a different capacity or operational role. Then classify the scope under the applicable FAA guidance and evaluate the standards, useful-life, operational, and cost implications. Under AC 150/5300-13B, reconstruction is complete restoration of original functionality with a minimum useful life equal to new construction, while rehabilitation is restoration of original functionality with a useful life at least equal to half the minimum useful life of new construction. These are definitions for that circular, not a substitute for project-specific engineering judgment or the relevant funding rules.
Because FAA classification details can vary by asset and handbook section, owners should confirm the applicable classification and standards with the relevant project documentation and guidance. The AIP Handbook provides the handbook index, including airport master plan references, and the FAA’s Airport Engineering, Design, & Construction Guidance & Policy page links to current engineering and construction guidance.
Owners should avoid treating the terms as interchangeable. Rehabilitation and reconstruction both restore original functionality in the cited design circular, but the scope and useful-life result differ. A replacement is not merely another name for reconstruction: it involves replacing the facility or item rather than restoring it. The classification must be checked against the applicable asset-specific handbook guidance and circumstances, and then considered alongside the engineering recommendation.
Does FAA funding favor new construction or renovation?
There is no general FAA preference that makes new construction or renovation the default winner for all airport projects. AIP treatment depends on the project’s eligibility, classification, justification, applicable standards, airport category, and the rules relevant to the asset and scope. Terminal development has a specific requirement to consider modification or rehabilitation before new development; it should not be presented as a blanket rule for other facilities.
Best Value
- Milwaukee Ink all Fine Point Marker, Black, 4 Per Pack
- 4 per pack Features Clog Resistant Marker Tip Writes through Dusty, Wet and Oily Surfaces Durable Marker Tip for Writing on Concrete, OSB and Rough Surfaces
- Clog resistant tip writes on dusty, wet and oily surfaces and is optimized for rough surfaces such as OSB, cinderblock and concrete
- Hard hat clip- attaches for easy access
- Quick dry time with reduced smearing and marking
Keep two decisions distinct: whether an option meets funding requirements, and whether it best addresses the airport’s documented need. An eligible alternative still needs to stand up to the technical, operational, environmental, and benefit-cost comparison.
Funding eligibility also does not eliminate the need to compare realistic alternatives. The project team should establish whether the scope is eligible and justified under the rules that apply, while separately assessing condition, function, safety, capacity, costs, and construction impacts. AIP guidance is relevant to AIP-funded projects; it should not be described as a universal funding rule for airports in every country or for every program.
What information should a project team assemble?
A decision is only as reliable as the comparison behind it. Before choosing a project approach, assemble the evidence needed to compare realistic alternatives on a consistent basis:
- A clearly stated operational need, deficiency, safety issue, or accepted planning requirement.
- Current condition information for the affected facility, including relevant inspection, pavement, or facility studies.
- A defined scope for maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, replacement, and any feasible new-build option.
- Operational analysis covering capacity, aircraft accommodation, movements, delays, schedule predictability, construction-period continuity, and alternate-airport effects.
- A standards and safety assessment explaining applicable requirements and how each alternative addresses them.
- Project and lifecycle cost estimates, benefit-cost information, construction impacts, and any costs or delays associated with alternatives.
- For a terminal, a documented comparison of modification or rehabilitation against new development, including cost, flexibility, expandability, and useful life.
- Environmental and community review appropriate to the location and scope.
- Funding documentation confirming applicable FAA/AIP eligibility, justification, airport category, and project classification.
Assemble this information for each genuine alternative, not just the preferred one. A useful comparison records the need addressed, the work proposed, the expected function and useful-life classification, standards implications, operating effects, costs and benefits, and any environmental or community review required. That makes it possible to identify where an option is inadequate, where evidence is still missing, and which conclusions depend on project-specific assumptions.
The final recommendation should follow from those findings. If the existing facility can meet the documented need through a sound rehabilitation, that may be the appropriate approach. If it cannot, or a new facility delivers a material project-specific advantage, new construction may be justified.
Common decision pitfalls
- Using “renovation” as if it were a precise scope. Specify whether the proposal is maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement, and check the asset-specific FAA guidance.
- Choosing a method before defining the need. State the required function and the deficiency or demand first, then compare ways to address it.
- Assuming the existing option is automatically cheaper. Compare lifecycle and project costs, benefits, disruption, construction effects, and alternate-airport time and cost consequences.
- Assuming new construction is automatically better. A new facility needs a documented advantage such as meeting a need the existing facility cannot meet, or a material project-specific benefit in capacity, flexibility, expansion, or useful life.
- Applying terminal rules to other assets. FAA’s requirement to consider existing terminal modification or rehabilitation before new development is a terminal-specific funding rule.
- Confusing eligibility with the best choice. AIP eligibility and project justification must be checked, but eligibility alone does not determine technical merit.
- Quoting a generic lifespan, cost premium, or schedule saving. No broadly applicable comparative figure is established in FAA guidance. Use the exact classification context and project-specific evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should we build a new airport terminal or renovate the existing one?
For terminal development, FAA guidance says modification or rehabilitation of existing facilities must be considered before new terminal development. FAA may consider a new terminal when its cost is comparable and it provides better flexibility, ability to expand, or longer useful life. Document what the existing-facility option can achieve, what need remains, and whether the new option has a material advantage. This is a terminal-funding rule, not a general rule for runways or every airport asset.
When is airport runway rehabilitation enough?
Rehabilitation may be enough when project-specific condition and operational evidence show that it can restore the required original functionality, meet applicable standards to the extent practicable, and provide the useful-life outcome relevant to the project classification. Runway safety, including safe approaches, and construction-period operations must also be considered. FAA guidance does not set a universal runway-condition threshold that automatically requires rehabilitation or new construction.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →How do airport owners decide between reconstruction and rehabilitation?
Define whether the work restores original functionality, then classify the scope under the applicable FAA guidance and assess standards, useful life, operations, and costs. For the purpose of AC 150/5300-13B, reconstruction restores original functionality with a minimum useful life equal to new construction; rehabilitation restores original functionality with a useful life at least equal to half the minimum useful life of new construction. Check asset-specific handbook details: these definitions are not a substitute for engineering judgment or funding rules.
Does FAA funding favor new construction or renovation?
There is no general FAA preference that makes either approach the default for every airport project. For AIP, confirm the specific project’s eligibility, justification, classification, airport category, applicable standards, and program rules. Terminal development has a distinct requirement to consider modification or rehabilitation before new development; it should not be generalized to other facilities. Eligibility does not prove that an option is the best technical or operational choice.
Is airport renovation always cheaper or faster than building new?
No general cost or schedule advantage is established by FAA material. Compare project and lifecycle costs, benefits, construction impacts, operations during work, and the cost and time consequences of alternatives such as using another airport. Use estimates and benefit-cost analysis for the actual project rather than a generic cost premium or time-saving claim.
The Bottom Line
Choose the project approach only after defining the airport need, classifying the scope correctly, and comparing the alternatives against the same operational, standards, cost, and environmental criteria. Rehabilitation may be appropriate when it can restore the required function and meet applicable expectations; new construction or reconstruction may be justified when the existing facility cannot meet the documented need or a new option provides a material project-specific advantage. FAA funding eligibility is a separate test from technical merit, and terminal guidance should not be generalized to every airport asset.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchQuick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
