The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Former Nedlands mayor Fiona Argyle’s 1,012-square-metre Kinninmont Avenue property sold for $2.9 million in June 2025, PerthNow reported on 14 July. Argyle said she sold because her family did not want a neighbouring home looking into her children’s bedrooms. The sale came after the neighbours won approval to build following a planning dispute and Argyle’s unsuccessful court challenge.
What sold, and for how much?
PerthNow reported that the Kinninmont Avenue block sold for $2.9 million in June 2025. The land measured 1,012 square metres, and the weatherboard house structure was sold separately. The report did not identify the buyer or establish whether the house was moved.
The sales advertisement presented the land as a development opportunity. It described in-principle approval for three lots and said R60 zoning could allow six lots of 150 square metres each. Those statements describe the advertised potential; they do not establish that six lots were approved, subdivided or built. The buyer’s plans and any later approvals were not reported.
Why did Argyle say she sold?
Speaking to PerthNow while abroad, Argyle said her family did not want to live with the neighbouring home looking into her children’s bedrooms. She described the impact as: “They destroyed our privacy.” That is Argyle’s characterization of the dispute, not an independent finding about the design or its effects.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
- Essential economics the way they think how to
Argyle also addressed the apparent tension between opposing the neighbours’ proposal and advertising development potential on her own property: “I know it sounds ironic but (the advert discusses what is possible under) the planning laws,” she said.
How did the dispute over the neighbouring house end?
Neighbours Annabelle and Stephen Purser sought approval for a two-storey home beside Argyle’s property. The City of Nedlands rejected their proposal twice, despite planning staff advice to approve it. During mediation, the couple changed the design; earlier coverage reported that the revised plans included additional screening to address privacy concerns.
The Pursers appealed to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) and secured the right to build. Argyle tried to take part as an interested third party and later challenged the outcome in the Supreme Court. That challenge failed, according to the 2022 coverage and the later sale report. The sequence matters: the council’s two refusals were not the final outcome; the neighbours obtained the right to build through the tribunal process.
PerthNow’s sale report says Argyle recused herself from the council vote because of her interest in the matter, while also reporting that she texted a councillor who supported the application. These details alone do not establish a finding of unlawful conduct.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What legal costs were reported?
Argyle told PerthNow that her unsuccessful legal effort cost her $90,000. The report also put the council’s legal bill at $30,000. The figures were reported without invoices or an independent accounting document, so they should be understood as reported costs rather than independently verified totals.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Cultivate a winning attitude and commence with assurance
- Penetrate jargon to grasp essentials
- Develop a lucrative business strategy and oversee finances
- Generate leads to engage with eager buyers and sellers
- Provide exceptional service to clients
Rank #4
Sources and scope
- PerthNow, 14 July 2025: sale, price, property area, listing claims, Argyle’s comments and dispute summary.
- PerthNow, 28 September 2022: the neighbours’ tribunal victory and Argyle’s failed Supreme Court challenge.
- The West Australian: Argyle’s effort to join the SAT dispute and reported design changes, including increased screening.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
